Entrepreneurial Intention of University Scientists in Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorTarapuez-Chamorro, Edwin
dc.creatorGuzmán-Díaz, Beatriz Elena
dc.creatorParra-Hernández, Ramiro
dc.date2022-05-30
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:48:56Z
dc.descriptionThis study aimed (1) to establish the main associations of social norms, attitudes, and behavior control variables with the Entrepreneurial Intention (EI) of university scientists in Colombia and (2) to identify the key factors that determine their EI. This descriptive correlational study adopted a quantitative approach, and the research design was non-experimental and cross-sectional. Two methods were used to analyze the data: multiple correspondence analysis and logistic regression. A stratified random sample of 636 scientists (in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) was taken from the database of the Colombian Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation. Out of the group of all the answered surveys, 597 were valid. The results indicate that higher educational attainment (Ph.D. and Postdoc) is associated with the commercialization of research results. They also show that social norms have the biggest influence on EI. It is concluded that university scientists that exhibit the highest EI (i.e., those who have or have had a company, were starting one, or had made the decision to do so) have, in general, a positive view of the social norms and attitudes studied here.en-US
dc.descriptionEl objetivo de este trabajo fue establecer las principales asociaciones de las normas sociales, actitudes y variables de control de comportamiento con la intención emprendedora (IE) de los científicos universitarios en Colombia e identificar cuáles son los factores clave que la determinan. Esta investigación fue descriptiva y correlacional, con enfoque cuantitativo; el diseño fue no experimental y transversal; se utilizaron dos métodos para el análisis de los datos: correspondencias múltiples y regresión logística. Se tomó una muestra aleatoria estratificada de 636 científicos de la base de datos del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (TIC) de Colombia, en las áreas de ciencias, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas. Del total de encuestas de la muestra, 597 fueron válidas. Los resultados indicaron que los científicos universitarios con mayores niveles de formación (doctorado y postdoctorado) estuvieron asociados con la comercialización de los resultados de sus investigaciones y que las normas sociales mostraron una mayor determinación de la IE. Se concluye que los científicos universitarios con las modalidades más avanzadas de IE, es decir, quienes tienen o tuvieron empresa, que estaban creándola o que estuvieron decididos a hacerlo, se relacionan en general con una visión positiva de las normas sociales y las actitudes estudiadas.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2013
dc.identifier10.22430/24223182.2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7068
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano - ITMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2013/2484
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2013/2502
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2013/2503
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2013/2516
dc.relation/*ref*/Asante, E. A., Affum-Osei, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs' opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Research, v. 98, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, n. 2, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
dc.relation/*ref*/Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall
dc.relation/*ref*/Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behaviour. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes (pp. 173-221). Erlbaum.
dc.relation/*ref*/Al-Shammari, M., Waleed, R. (2018). Entrepreneurial intention of private university students in the kingdom of Bahrain. International Journal of Innovation Science, v. 10, n. 1, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-06-2017-0058
dc.relation/*ref*/Arranz, N., Ubierna, F., Arroyabe, M. F., Pérez, C., Fernández de Arroyabe, J. C. (2016). The effect of curricular and extracurricular activities on university students’ entrepreneurial intention and competences. Studies in Higher Education, v. 42, n. 11, 1979-2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130030
dc.relation/*ref*/Bijedić, T., Chlosta, S., Werner, A. (2021). Inventions and Their Commercial Exploitation in German Universities: Analyzing Determinants Among Academic Researchers. In D. Mietzner, C. Schultz (eds), New Perspectives in Technology Transfer. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship (pp. 11-30). Springer
dc.relation/*ref*/Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Academy of Management Review, v. 13, n. 3, 442-453. https://doi.org/10.2307/258091
dc.relation/*ref*/Blair, C. A., Shaver, K. G. (2019). Of Horses and Jockeys: Perceptions by Academic Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, v. 10, n. 2, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0011
dc.relation/*ref*/Buratti, N., Profumo, G., Persico, L. (2021). The impact of market orientation on university spin-off business performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, v. 19, n. 1, 104-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-020-00282-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., Blois, G. V. (2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 135, 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.015
dc.relation/*ref*/Davey, T., Galan-Muros, V. (2020). Understanding entrepreneurial academics ‐ how they perceive their environment differently. Journal of Management Development, v. 39, n. 5, 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2019-0392
dc.relation/*ref*/Diánez-González, J. P., Camelo-Ordaz, C., Fernández-Alles, M. (2020). Drivers and implications of entrepreneurial orientation for academic spin-offs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 17, n. 2, 1007-1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00652-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Entrialgo, M., Iglesias, V. (2018). Are the Intentions to Entrepreneurship of Men and Women Shaped Differently? The Impact of Entrepreneurial Role-Model Exposure and Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, v. 8, n. 1, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0013
dc.relation/*ref*/Erikson, T., Knockaert, M., Foo, M. D. (2015). Enterprising scientists: The shaping role of norms, experience and scientific productivity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 99, 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.022
dc.relation/*ref*/Esfandiar, K., Sharifi-Tehrani, M., Pratt, S., Altinay, L. (2019). Understanding entrepreneurial intentions: A developed integrated structural model approach. Journal of Business Research, v. 94, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.045
dc.relation/*ref*/Fedesarrollo. (2022, febrero). Evaluación de impacto de la política de formación de capital humano de alto nivel: programa de créditos condonables de doctorado 1992-2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11445/4258
dc.relation/*ref*/Galati, F., Bigliardi, B., Passaro, R., Quinto, I. (2020). Why do academics become entrepreneurs? How do their motivations evolve? Results from an empirical study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, v. 26, n. 7, 1477-1503.
dc.relation/*ref*/Galleguillos-Cortés, C., Escobar-Burgos, B., Hurtado-Cailly, R. (2019). Predictores de la Intención Emprendedora en Alumnos de Pregrado: Un Modelo Basado en Ecuaciones Estructurales. Formación Universitaria, v. 12, n. 1, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000100083
dc.relation/*ref*/Goethner, M., Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., Cantner, U. (2012). Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 33, n. 3, 628-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. (2014). Academics' start-up intentions and knowledge filters: An individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, v. 43, n. 1, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9526-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Gür, U. (2017). Academic entrepreneurial intentions in science and engineering: validation of the scale in Turkey. Pressacademia, v. 5, n. 1, 350-358. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.610
dc.relation/*ref*/Hossinger, S. M., Chen, X., Werner, A. (2020). Drivers, barriers and success factors of academic spin-offs: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, v. 70, 97-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11301-019-00161-W
dc.relation/*ref*/Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M. (2015). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 40, n. 1, 138-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9333-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Krabel, S., Mueller, P. (2009). What drives scientists to start their own company?: An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 6, 947-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Krueger, N. (1993). The Impact of Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure on Perceptions of New Venture Feasibility and Desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 18, n. 1, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879301800101
dc.relation/*ref*/Kurczewska, A., Mackiewicz, M., Doryń, W., Wawrzyniak, D. (2020). Peculiarity of hybrid entrepreneurs – revisiting Lazear’s theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Economics and Management, v. 21, n. 1, 277-300. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11959
dc.relation/*ref*/Landis, D., Triandis, H. C., Adamopoulos, J. (1978). Habit and behavioral intentions as predictors of social behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, v. 106, n. 2, 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1978.9924174
dc.relation/*ref*/Ley 4 de 1992. (1992, 18 de mayo). Congreso de Colombia. URL
dc.relation/*ref*/Ley 1014 de 2006. De fomento a la cultura del emprendimiento. (2006, 26 de enero). Congreso de Colombia. URL
dc.relation/*ref*/Ley 1838 de 2017. Por la cual se dictan normas de fomento a la ciencia, tecnología e innovación mediante la creación de empresas de base tecnológica (Spin offs) y se dictan otras disposiciones. (2017, 6 de julio). Congreso de Colombia. URL
dc.relation/*ref*/Liñán, F., Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 11, n. 4, 907-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Mejía-Ordoñez, J. P., Arias-Marín, C. M., Echeverri-Sánchez, L. C. (2017). El papel de la educación en creación de empresas en el contexto universitario a partir de los estudios registrados en Scopus. Revista CEA, v. 3, n. 5, 69-87. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.651
dc.relation/*ref*/Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia. (s. f.). Servicio de información de evaluadores pares reconocidos del SNCTEL. https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/ciencia-war/busquedaPares.do
dc.relation/*ref*/Miranda, F. J., Chamorro-Mera, A., Rubio, S. (2017). Academic entrepreneurship in Spanish universities: An analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurial intention. European Research on Management and Business Economics, v. 23, n. 2, 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.01.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., Ramaciotti, L. (2016). The effects of university rules on spin off creation: The case of academia in Italy. Research Policy, v. 45, n. 7, 1386-1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.011
dc.relation/*ref*/Muslim, A., Harun, A., Ismael, D., Othman, B. (2020). Social media experience, attitude and behavioral intention towards umrah package among generation X and Y. Management Science Letters, v. 10, n. 1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.020
dc.relation/*ref*/Neves, S., Brito, C. (2020). Academic entrepreneurship intentions: a systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development, v. 39, n. 5, 645-704. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11- 2019-0451
dc.relation/*ref*/O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Zhang, J. A., Cunningham, J. A. (2020). How university-based principal investigators shape a hybrid role identity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 159, 120179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120179
dc.relation/*ref*/Olaya-Escobar, E. S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Duarte-Velasco, O. G. (2021). Factores que impulsan a los investigadores a participar en contratos de investigación y desarrollo. TEC Empresarial, v. 15, n. 3, 18-36. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2909
dc.relation/*ref*/Pedraza, A., León, J., Betancur, C. (2015). Which professors are helping universities to transfer technology by creating Spin Off? European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 546- 554. https://www.proquest.com/conference-papers-proceedings/which-professors-are-helping-universities/docview/1728250052/se-2?accountid=30687
dc.relation/*ref*/Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. -Y., Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 88, n. 5, 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
dc.relation/*ref*/Rajaeian, M. M., Cater-Steel, A., Lane, M. (2018). Determinants of effective knowledge transfer from academic researchers to industry practitioners. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 47, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.12.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Reyes-Cruz, J. L., Sánchez-Trujillo, M. G., Mejía-Ramírez, R. (2019). Influencia de la formación universitaria en las actitudes emprendedoras. Revista CEA, v. 5, n. 10, 117-133. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.1240
dc.relation/*ref*/Sciarelli, M., Landi, G. C., Turriziani, L., Tani, M. (2020). Academic entrepreneurship: founding and governance determinants in university spin-off ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 46, 1083-1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09798-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Soria-Barreto, K., Zuniga-Jara, S., Ruiz-Campo, S. (2016). Educación e Intención Emprendedora en Estudiantes Universitarios: Un Caso de Estudio. Formación Universitaria, v. 9, n. 1, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062016000100004
dc.relation/*ref*/Summers, D. F. (2000). The Formation of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Garland Publishing Inc dos Santos Souza, R., Silveira, A. (2018). Intención emprendedora en contexto universitario brasileño. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina, v. 11, n. 2, 297-318. https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2018v11n2p297
dc.relation/*ref*/Tarapuez Chamorro, E., Osorio Ceballos, H., Botero Villa, J. J. (2013). Política de emprendimiento en Colombia, 2002-2010. Estudios Gerenciales, v. 29, n. 128, 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.09.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Tarapuez Chamorro, E., García González, M. D., Castellano, N. (2015). Elementos para la construcción de un instrumento que permita medir la intención empresarial en estudiantes universitarios de último semestre. Tendencias, v. 16, n. 2, 209-227. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.151602.28
dc.relation/*ref*/Thompson, E. R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 33, n. 3, 669-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00321.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.
dc.relation/*ref*/Wang, M., Soetanto, D., Cai, J., Munir, H. (2021). Scientist or Entrepreneur? Identity centrality, university entrepreneurial mission, and academic entrepreneurial intention. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 47, n. 1, 119-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09845-6
dc.relation/*ref*/Yaseen, A., Saleem, M. A., Zahra, S., Israr, M. (2018). Precursory effects on entrepreneurial behaviour in the agri-food industry. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, v. 10, n. 1, 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2016-0029
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Edwin Tarapuezes-ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 8 No. 17 (2022); e2013en-US
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 8 Núm. 17 (2022); e2013es-ES
dc.source2422-3182
dc.source2390-0725
dc.subjectBusiness Owneren-US
dc.subjectEntrepreneurial Intentionen-US
dc.subjectScientific Researcheren-US
dc.subjectFacultyen-US
dc.subjectempresarioes-ES
dc.subjectintención emprendedoraes-ES
dc.subjectinvestigador científicoes-ES
dc.subjectpersonal académicoes-ES
dc.titleEntrepreneurial Intention of University Scientists in Colombiaen-US
dc.titleLa intención emprendedora de los científicos universitarios en Colombiaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Miniatura
Nombre:
revistacea_x_2013_final.pdf
Tamaño:
542.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_638170562007.epub
Tamaño:
1.48 MB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_638170562007.xml
Tamaño:
164.73 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2516.html
Tamaño:
186.04 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista CEA - Cosecha Portal de Revistas