Innovation Capabilities in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorJurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando
dc.creatorChica-Vélez, Sergio Alberto
dc.date2025-05-30
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:49:16Z
dc.descriptionObjective: This review analyzes how innovation capabilities in the public sector have been studied, with a focus on conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and directions for future research.Design/Methodology: A qualitative, descriptive approach was adopted. Specifically, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, 56 relevant documents were identified and thoroughly examined.Findings: A lack of consensus on how innovation capabilities are measured hinders the development of unified variables that could inform the design of diagnostic tools and the implementation of strategies aimed at improving innovation processes. Also, existing measurement scales tend to rely on metrics derived from the private sector, which underscores the importance of adapting them to the dynamics of the public sector. Finally, the proposed research agenda points to four key areas for further exploration: crises and innovation capabilities, collective intelligence and innovation capabilities, emerging technologies and innovation capabilities in the public sector, and innovation and innovation capabilities.Conclusions: While innovation capabilities have been widely explored in private-sector contexts, there is still a pressing need for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies to support the development of a clear taxonomy within the public sector. This is particularly important given the distinct characteristics of public organizations, which differ significantly from those of their private counterparts.Originality: This study contributes to ongoing discussions on innovation capabilities in the public sector by emphasizing the importance of research that considers the contexts of emerging countries, acknowledges the sector’s particularities, and advances the development of a unified model to guide future academic and empirical efforts.en-US
dc.descriptionObjetivo: la presente revisión de literatura tuvo como objetivo analizar cómo se ha abordado el estudio de las capacidades de innovación en el sector público desde el punto de vista de la definición conceptual, los métodos de medición y la agenda para futuras investigaciones.Diseño/Metodología: la investigación empleó un enfoque cualitativo de alcance descriptivo. Específicamente, se acudió al método Prisma, con el cual se identificaron 56 documentos que fueron revisados a profundidad.Resultados: Se evidenció que la medición de las capacidades de innovación aún carece de acuerdos que permitan trabajar con variables unificadas, que guíen el diseño de métricas para desarrollar ejercicios de diagnóstico y puesta en marcha de planes para mejorar los procesos de innovación. Las escalas han privilegiado la adopción de métricas propias del sector privado, siendo necesario ajustarlas al contexto del sector público. Por último, la agenda de investigación plantea la necesidad de focalizar cuatro categorías de análisis: crisis y capacidades de innovación, inteligencia colectiva y capacidades de innovación, tecnologías emergentes y capacidades de innovación en el sector público e innovación y capacidades de innovación.Conclusiones: si bien las capacidades de innovación han sido ampliamente trabajadas en el contexto del sector privado, aún falta por desarrollar más estudios de enfoque cualitativo, cuantitativo y mixto que ayuden a generar una taxonomía clara sobre la temática en el contexto del sector público, más aún cuando el mismo presenta características particulares que difieren notoriamente del privado.Originalidad: el estudio aporta a la discusión sobre capacidades de innovación en el sector público, mostrando la necesidad de desarrollar trabajos que aboguen por considerar contextos de países emergentes, las particularidades del sector público y la unificación de un modelo general que sirva como referencia para futuros trabajos académicos y empíricos.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/3384
dc.identifier10.22430/24223182.3384
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7169
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano - ITMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/3384/3707
dc.relation/*ref*/Adams, R., Bessant, J., y Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Agarwal, R., Mittal, N., Patterson, E., y Giorcelli, M. (2021). Evolution of the Indian LPG industry: Exploring conditions for public sector business model innovation. Research Policy, 50(4), 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104196
dc.relation/*ref*/Ali, A., Iqbal, S., Haider, S. A., Tehseen, S., Anwar, B., Sohail, M., y Rehman, K. (2021). Does Governance in Information Technology Matter When It Comes to Organizational Performance in Pakistani Public Sector Organizations? Mediating Effect of Innovation. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016557
dc.relation/*ref*/Al-Noaimi, H. A., Al-Jayyousi, O. R., y Durugbo, C. M. (2021). Between dogma and doubt: A meta-synthesis of innovation in the public sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83, 201-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12501
dc.relation/*ref*/AlNuaimi, B. K., y Khan, M. (2019). Public-sector green procurement in the United Arab Emirates: Innovation capability and commitment to change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.090
dc.relation/*ref*/Alshanty, A. M., y Emeagwali, O. L. (2019). Market-sensing capability, knowledge creation and innovation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial-orientation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.02.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., y Torfing, J. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
dc.relation/*ref*/Arundel, A., Bloch, C., y Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Arundel, A., Casali, L., y Hollanders, H. (2015). How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods. Research Policy, 44(7), 1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
dc.relation/*ref*/Barrutia, J. M., Echebarria, C., Aguado-Moralejo, I., Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V., y Hartmann, P. (2022). Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121679
dc.relation/*ref*/Basit, T. N. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188032000133548
dc.relation/*ref*/Bloch, C. (2011). Measuring public innovation in the Nordic countries (MEPIN). Nordic Innovation Centre (NICe) - The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy (CFA). http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:707193/FULLTEXT01.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F., y Eden, C. (2007). Putting the Resource-Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies to Work in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 702–717. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4624619
dc.relation/*ref*/Carneiro, D. K., Isidro Filho, A., y Criado, J. I. (2023). Public Sector Innovation Ecosystems: A Proposition for Theoretical-Conceptual Integration. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(14), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2213853
dc.relation/*ref*/Chang, W. C., Lin, W. Z., Chen, W. Z., Chiou, W. K., y Lin, O. S. (2025). Design-driven innovation in the public sector: insights from case studies of initiatives in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2025.2457166
dc.relation/*ref*/Chartered Association of Business Schools. (2021). Academic Journal Guide 2021. ABS. https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2021/#how-to-use
dc.relation/*ref*/Chen, J., Walker, R. M., y Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874
dc.relation/*ref*/Clausen, T. H., Demircioglu, M. A., y Alsos, G. A. (2020). Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors. Public Administration, 98(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12617
dc.relation/*ref*/Combs, J. P., Bustamante, R. M., y Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2010). An interactive model for facilitating development of literature reviews. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.159
dc.relation/*ref*/Cortes, A. F., y Herrmann, P. (2021). Strategic Leadership of Innovation: A Framework for Future Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12246
dc.relation/*ref*/Criado, J. I., Alcaide-Muñoz, L., y Liarte, I. (2023). Two decades of public sector innovation: building an analytical framework from a systematic literature review of types, strategies, conditions, and results. Public Management Review, 27(3), 623-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2254310
dc.relation/*ref*/Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., y Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational Performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
dc.relation/*ref*/De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., y Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
dc.relation/*ref*/De Vries, H., Tummers, L., y Bekkers, V. (2018). The Diffusion and Adoption of Public Sector Innovations: A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001
dc.relation/*ref*/Demircioglu, M. A., y Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004
dc.relation/*ref*/Dodaro, M. (2023). Municipal Entrepreneurship Support Policies: Convergence orDivergence? Local Government Studies, 49(2), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1932479
dc.relation/*ref*/Dockx, E., y Verhoest, K. (2023). Dissecting the organization matters: Gauging the effect of unit-level and organization-level factors on perceived innovation outcomes. Public Policy and Administration, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231193605
dc.relation/*ref*/Eisenhardt, K. M., y Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
dc.relation/*ref*/Feldman, M. S., y Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
dc.relation/*ref*/Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos cualitativos en Investigación Cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.
dc.relation/*ref*/Gieske, H., Van Meerkerk, I., y Van Buuren, A. (2019). The Impact of Innovation and Optimization on Public Sector Performance: Testing the Contribution of Connective, Ambidextrous, and Learning Capabilities. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(2), 432–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1470014
dc.relation/*ref*/Gómez Muñoz, C. F., y Moreno Romero, A. (2021). Organisational Innovation in Bureaucracies: An Impossible Mission? Dirección y Organización, 74, 54-66. https://doi.org/10.37610/dyo.v0i74.602
dc.relation/*ref*/Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
dc.relation/*ref*/Gullmark, P. (2021). Do All Roads Lead to Innovativeness? A Study of Public Sector Organizations’ Innovation Capabilities. American Review of Public Administration, 51(7), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211010464
dc.relation/*ref*/Gullmark, P., y Clausen, T. H. (2023). In search of innovation capability and its sources in local government organizations: a critical interpretative synthesis of the literature. International Public Management Journal, 26(2), 258–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2157917
dc.relation/*ref*/Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., y Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation/*ref*/Hall, J. L. (2007). Informing State Economic Development Policy in the New Economy: A Theoretical Foundation and Empirical Examination of State Innovation in the United States. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00749.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., y Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
dc.relation/*ref*/Hiebl, M. R. W. (2021). Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
dc.relation/*ref*/Huynh, T. N., Van Nguyen, P., Do, A. M., Dinh, P. U., y Vo, H. T. (2024). Fostering organizational performance through innovation: The roles of environmental policy instruments, organizational learning supports, and intellectual capital. Heliyon, 10(20), e39361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39361
dc.relation/*ref*/Janssen, S., Moeller, K., y Schlaefke, M. (2011). Using performance measures conceptually in innovation control. Journal of Management Control, 22(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-011-0130-y
dc.relation/*ref*/Jegerson, D., Jabeen, F., Abdulla, H. H., Putrevu, J., y Streimikiene, D. (2024). Does emotional intelligence impact service innovation capabilities? Exploring the role of diversity climate and innovation culture. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2022-0235
dc.relation/*ref*/Jørgensen, T. B., y Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707300703
dc.relation/*ref*/Jurado-Zambrano, D. A., y Echeverrri Hoyos, I. C. (2024). Dinamizando la gestión del conocimiento a través de mapas de conocimiento: un análisis desde los beneficios y las dificultades. Revista CEA, 10(24), e2763. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.2763
dc.relation/*ref*/Kattel, R., y Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032
dc.relation/*ref*/Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., Mcgahan, A. M., y Pitelis, C. N. (2013). Capabilities and Strategic Entrepreneurship in Public Organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1147
dc.relation/*ref*/Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., y Verhoest, K. (2011). Explaining the Innovative Culture and Activities of State Agencies. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1321–1347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611416744
dc.relation/*ref*/Lambert, F. (2013). Seeking electronic information from government resources: A comparative analysis of two communities’ web searching of municipal government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Lapuente, V., y Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, Bureaucratic Legalism, and Innovative Attitudes in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13175
dc.relation/*ref*/Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., y Klijn, E. H. (2017). How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085
dc.relation/*ref*/Liarte, I., Criado, J. I., y Alcaide-muñoz, L. (2025). Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A Comparative Study of Spanish Local Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2451390
dc.relation/*ref*/Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., y Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
dc.relation/*ref*/Lidman, L. (2024). The Gap Between the Rhetorical Why and the Practical What and How of Public Sector Innovation. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(11), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2197175
dc.relation/*ref*/Meijer, A. (2018). Public Innovation Capacity: Developing and Testing a Self-Assessment Survey Instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102
dc.relation/*ref*/Moon, M. J., y Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? the adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674175587
dc.relation/*ref*/Moussa, M., McMurray, A., y Muenjohn, N. (2018). Innovation in public sector organisations. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1475047. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1475047
dc.relation/*ref*/O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Implementing public innovations in network settings. Administration and Society, 29(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979702900201
dc.relation/*ref*/Organización de Cooperación y Desarrollo Económicos y Oficina de Estadísticas de las Comunidades Europeas. (2005). Manual de Oslo: Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación (3ª ed.). Tragsa. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065659-es
dc.relation/*ref*/Osborne, S. P., y Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Pablo, A. L., Reay, T., Dewald, J. R., y Casebeer, A. L. (2007). Identifying, enabling and managing dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
dc.relation/*ref*/Pang, M. S., Lee, G., y Delone, W. H. (2014). IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations: a public-value management perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 29(3), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.2
dc.relation/*ref*/Paskaleva, K., y Cooper, I. (2018). Open innovation and the evaluation of internet-enabled public services in smart cities. Technovation, 78, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.07.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Paul, J., y Rialp Criado, A. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
dc.relation/*ref*/Piening, E. P. (2011). Insights into the Process Dynamics of Innovation Implementation: The case of public hospitals in Germany. Public Management Review, 13(1), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.501615
dc.relation/*ref*/Piening, E. P. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 15(2), 209–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.708358
dc.relation/*ref*/Pučėtaitė, R., Novelskaitė, A., Lämsä, A. M., y Riivari, E. (2016). The Relationship Between Ethical Organisational Culture and Organisational Innovativeness: Comparison of Findings from Finland and Lithuania. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3051-8
dc.relation/*ref*/Renard, L., y St-Amant, G. E. (2003). Capacité, capacité organisationnelle et capacité dynamique : une proposition de définitions. Les Cahiers Du Management Technologique, 13(1). http://www.sietmanagement.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/RenardStAmant2003.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., Lewis, J. M., y Ysa, T. (2017). Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: a comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review, 19(2), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1148192
dc.relation/*ref*/Robledo, J., López, C., Zapata, W., y Pérez, J. D. (2010). Desarrollo de una Metodología de Evaluación de Capacidades de Innovación. Perfil de Coyuntura Económica, 15, 133–148. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=86120154007
dc.relation/*ref*/Schilke, O., Hu, S., y Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 390–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0014
dc.relation/*ref*/Shahzad, M. K., Ahmed, S., Anwar, F., y Hussain, T. (2024). Achieving competitiveness through innovation capability: developing what public sector customers really need. Measuring Business Excellence, 28(3/4), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-04-2024-0052
dc.relation/*ref*/Software Engineering Group School of Computer Science and Mathematics Keele University y Department of Computer Science University of Durham. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering Version 2.3. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Sørensen, E., y Torfing, J. (2019). Designing institutional platforms and arenas for interactive political leadership. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1443–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1559342
dc.relation/*ref*/Staples, M., y Niazi, M. (2007). Experiences using systematic review guidelines. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1425–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.046
dc.relation/*ref*/Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., y Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
dc.relation/*ref*/Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., y Mcneal, R. (2008). Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
dc.relation/*ref*/Torvinen, H., y Jansson, K. (2023). Public health care innovation lab tackling the barriers of public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 25(8), 1539–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2029107
dc.relation/*ref*/Trivellato, B., Martini, M., y Cavenago, D. (2020). How Do Organizational Capabilities Sustain Continuous Innovation in a Public Setting? American Review of Public Administration, 51(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020939263
dc.relation/*ref*/Tsai, W., y Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/257085
dc.relation/*ref*/Velsberg, O., Westergren, U. H., y Jonsson, K. (2020). Exploring smartness in public sector innovation - creating smart public services with the Internet of Things. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1761272
dc.relation/*ref*/Yam, R. C. M., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F., y Tang, E. P. Y. (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: Some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
dc.relation/*ref*/Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6a ed.). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
dc.relation/*ref*/Zahra, S. A., y George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4134351
dc.relation/*ref*/Zambrano-Gutiérrez, J. C., y Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2022). The Dynamics of Sources of Knowledge on the Nature of Innovation in the Public Sector: Understanding Incremental and Transformative Innovations in Local Governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab053
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2025 Diego Armando Jurado-Zambrano, Sergio Alberto Chica-Vélezes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 11 No. 26 (2025); e3384en-US
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 11 Núm. 26 (2025); e3384es-ES
dc.source2422-3182
dc.source2390-0725
dc.subjectinnovación públicaes-ES
dc.subjectcapacidades de innovaciónes-ES
dc.subjectsector públicoes-ES
dc.subjectcapacidades organizacionales.es-ES
dc.subjectpublic innovationen-US
dc.subjectinnovation capabilitiesen-US
dc.subjectpublic sectoren-US
dc.subjectorganizational capabilitiesen-US
dc.titleInnovation Capabilities in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Reviewen-US
dc.titleCapacidades de innovación en el sector público: una revisión sistemática de literaturaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
3384_v11n26_PDF.pdf
Tamaño:
876.46 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista CEA - Cosecha Portal de Revistas