Clinical Perceptions and Feasibility Analysis of a Virtual Reality Game for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorVillada Castillo, Julián Felipe
dc.creatorLópez, José Fernando
dc.creatorMuñoz, John Edison
dc.creatorHenao Gallo, Oscar
dc.date2024-12-27
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:53:14Z
dc.descriptionThe increasing prevalence of strokes has led to the search for innovative rehabilitation methods. Immersive virtual reality (VR), especially personalized games, offers an interactive and motivating approach to therapy adherence. The perception and acceptance of physiotherapists are crucial to its implementation and require further investigation. The objective of this research was to evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of physiotherapists regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of a personalized VR game called Motion Health VR for post-stroke rehabilitation. The methodology employed consisted of using three strategies to collect subjective data. First, a multiple-choice questionnaire was administered to 73 physicians and physiatrists during the ISPRM 2023 Conference (International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine) to collect quantitative data on the utility and feasibility of Motion Health VR. Subsequently, a focus group was conducted with four physiotherapists to obtain qualitative information on the usability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of the game. Finally, a feasibility and cost-effectiveness analysis were performed to evaluate the possible long-term benefits and financial implications of implementing Motion Health VR in Colombia. The results obtained were a broad acceptance of VR as a complementary tool in post-stroke rehabilitation and the recognition of personalized games as motivators for patient participation. Physiotherapists highlighted the playability and immersion of the game, although they noted limitations related to costs and spasticity of the patient. The analysis indicated that initial costs, while significant, could be justified by long-term savings and improved patient outcomes. Finally, it is concluded that Motion Health VR demonstrated significant potential to complement post-stroke rehabilitation, receiving positive feedback from physiotherapists. Key challenges include improving access, reducing costs, and providing VR training to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.en-US
dc.descriptionLa creciente prevalencia de accidentes cerebrovasculares (ACV) ha impulsado la búsqueda de métodos de rehabilitación innovadores. La realidad virtual inmersiva (RV), especialmente los juegos personalizados, ofrece un enfoque interactivo y motivador para la adherencia a la terapia. La percepción y aceptación de los fisioterapeutas son cruciales para su implementación y requieren mayor investigación. El objetivo de esta investigación consistió en evaluar las actitudes y percepciones de los fisioterapeutas con respecto a la viabilidad y eficacia de un juego de realidad virtual personalizado llamado Motion Health VR para la rehabilitación posterior al ACV. La metodología empleada consistió en utilizar tres estrategias para recopilar datos subjetivos. Primero, se administró un cuestionario de opción múltiple a 73 médicos y fisiatras durante la Conferencia ISPRM 2023 (Sociedad Internacional de Medicina Física y de Rehabilitación) para obtener datos cuantitativos sobre la utilidad y viabilidad de Motion Health VR. Seguidamente, se realizó un grupo de discusión con 4 fisioterapeutas para obtener información cualitativa sobre la usabilidad, accesibilidad y rentabilidad del juego. Luego, se realizó un análisis de viabilidad y costo-efectividad para evaluar los posibles beneficios a largo plazo y las implicaciones financieras de la implementación de Motion Health VR en Colombia. Los resultados obtenidos fueron una amplia aceptación de la RV como herramienta complementaria en la rehabilitación post-ACV y el reconocimiento de los juegos personalizados como motivadores para la participación del paciente. Los fisioterapeutas destacaron su jugabilidad e inmersión, aunque señalaron limitaciones relacionadas con costos y espasticidad del paciente. El análisis indicó que los costos iniciales, aunque significativos, pueden justificarse por los ahorros a largo plazo y los mejores resultados para los pacientes. Finalmente, se concluye que Motion Health VR mostró un potencial significativo para complementar la rehabilitación post-ACV, siendo bien recibido por los fisioterapeutas. Los desafíos clave incluyen mejorar el acceso, reducir costos y brindar capacitación en RV para optimizar los resultados de rehabilitación.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formatapplication/epub+zip
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3180
dc.identifier10.22430/22565337.3180
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7921
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM)es-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3180/3478
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3180/3497
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3180/3553
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3180/3560
dc.relation/*ref*/K. C. Wagle, and C. S. Ivan, “Cerebrovascular Disease,” in Family Medicine, P. M. Paulman, R. B. Taylor, A. A. Paulman, and L. S. Nasir, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54441-6_72
dc.relation/*ref*/Z. Adey-Wakeling, and M. Crotty, “Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Stroke: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives,” Aging health, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 629–647, Nov. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2217/ahe.13.67
dc.relation/*ref*/R. L. Harvey MD, “Predictors of Functional Outcome Following Stroke,” Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 583–598, Nov. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2015.07.002
dc.relation/*ref*/K. S. Hayward et al., “A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke,” Syst. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 187, Jul. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-019-1093-6
dc.relation/*ref*/N. Aderinto, G. Olatunji, M. Opeyemi Abdulbasit, M. Edun, G. Aboderin, and E. Egbunu, “Exploring the efficacy of virtual reality-based rehabilitation in stroke: a narrative review of current evidence,” Ann Med., vol. 55, no. 2, Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2285907
dc.relation/*ref*/I. Göttgens, and S. Oertelt-Prigione, “The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices,” JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, vol. 9, no. 12, p. e28102, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2196/28102
dc.relation/*ref*/O. Postolache, D. Jude Hemanth, R. Alexandre, D. Gupta, O. Geman, and A. Khanna, “Remote Monitoring of Physical Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients Using IoT and Virtual Reality,” IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 39, no. 2, Feb. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2020.3020600
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Jones et al., “Big Data Analytics and Sensor-Enhanced Activity Management to Improve Effectiveness and Efficiency of Outpatient Medical Rehabilitation,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 748, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030748
dc.relation/*ref*/P. C. Alves Brepohl, and H. Leite, “Virtual reality applied to physiotherapy: a review of current knowledge,” Virtual Real, vol. 27, pp. 71–95, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00654-2
dc.relation/*ref*/W.-S. Kim et al., “Clinical Application of Virtual Reality for Upper Limb Motor Rehabilitation in Stroke: Review of Technologies and Clinical Evidence,” Journal Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 3369, Oct. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103369
dc.relation/*ref*/C. Tuena et al., “Usability Issues of Clinical and Research Applications of Virtual Reality in Older People: A Systematic Review,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 14, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00093
dc.relation/*ref*/C. Vieira, C. Ferreira da Silva Pais-Vieira, J. Novais, and A. Perrotta, “Serious Game Design and Clinical Improvement in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review,” JMIR Serious Games, vol. 9, no. 3, p. e20066, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2196/20066
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Seinsche et al., “A Newly Developed Exergame-Based Telerehabilitation System for Older Adults: Usability and Technology Acceptance Study,” JMIR Hum Factors, vol. 10, p. e48845, May. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2196/48845
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Bryant et al., “Collaborative co-design and evaluation of an immersive virtual reality application prototype for communication rehabilitation (DISCOVR prototype),” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 90–99, Apr. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2063423
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Krishnan, M. A. Mandala, S. L. Wolf, A. Howard, and T. M. Kesar, “Perceptions of stroke survivors regarding factors affecting adoption of technology and exergames for rehabilitation,” PM&R, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1403–1410, Nov. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12963
dc.relation/*ref*/G. A. Albanese et al., “Robotic systems for upper-limb rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a SWOT analysis and the synergies with virtual and augmented environments,” Front Robot AI, vol. 11, Feb. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1335147
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Vaezipour, D. Aldridge, S. Koenig, D. Theodoros, and T. Russell, “‘It’s really exciting to think where it could go’: a mixed-method investigation of clinician acceptance, barriers and enablers of virtual reality technology in communication rehabilitation,” Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 44, no. 15, pp. 3946–3958, Mar. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1895333
dc.relation/*ref*/M. M. T. E. Kouijzer, H. Kip, Y. H. A. Bouman, and S. M. Kelders, “Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings,” Implementation Science Communications, vol. 4, p. 67, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Endresen Moan, E. Klaebo Vonstad, X. Su, B. Vereijken, M. Solbjør, and N. Skjæret-Maroni, “Experiences of Stroke Survivors and Clinicians with a Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Treadmill Exergame for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Pilot Study,” Front Aging Neurosci, vol. 13, p. 735251, Nov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNAGI.2021.735251
dc.relation/*ref*/R. C. Stockley, and D. L. Christian, “A focus group study of therapists’ views on using a novel neuroanimation virtual reality game to deliver intensive upper-limb rehabilitation early after stroke,” Arch. Physiother., vol. 12, no. 1, Jan-Dec. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40945-022-00139-0
dc.relation/*ref*/J.-A. Lee, J.-G. Kim, and H. Kweon, “A Study on Rehabilitation Specialists’ Perception of Experience with a Virtual Reality Program,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 814, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/HEALTHCARE11060814
dc.relation/*ref*/N. Roman et al., “The Benefits of Combining Mixed Virtual Reality Exergaming with Occupational Therapy for Upper Extremity Dexterity,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 1431, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12061431
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Gustavsson, E. K. Kjörk, M. Erhardsson, and M. Alt Murphy, “Virtual reality gaming in rehabilitation after stroke – user experiences and perceptions,” Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 6759–6765, Aug. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1972351
dc.relation/*ref*/H. Morse, L. Biggart, V. Pomeroy, and S. Rossit, “Exploring perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians on virtual reality as a precursor to using telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke,” Neuropsychol Rehabil, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 767–791, Sep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2020.1819827
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Wang, J.-L. Chen, A. M. K. Wong, K.-C. Liang, and K. C. Tseng, “Game-Based Virtual Reality System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke in a Clinical Environment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Games Health, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 277–297, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1089/G4H.2022.0086
dc.relation/*ref*/K. J. Miller, B. S. Adair, A. J. Pearce, C. M. Said, E. Ozanne, and M. M. Morris, “Effectiveness and feasibility of virtual reality and gaming system use at home by older adults for enabling physical activity to improve health-related domains: a systematic review,” Age and Ageing, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 188–195, Dec. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/AGEING/AFT194
dc.relation/*ref*/I. Laffont et al., “Rehabilitation of the upper arm early after stroke: Video games versus conventional rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial,” Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 173–180, May. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.REHAB.2019.10.009
dc.relation/*ref*/D. B. Mekbib et al., “Virtual reality therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a meta-análisis of randomized clinical trials,” Brain Injury, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 456–465, Feb. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2020.1725126
dc.relation/*ref*/D. E. Levac, and P. A. Miller, “Integrating virtual reality video games into practice: Clinicians’ experiences,” Physiother. Theory Pract., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 504–512, Jan. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2012.762078
dc.relation/*ref*/C. J. Winstein et al., “Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery,” Stroke, vol. 47, no. 6, May. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
dc.relation/*ref*/P. M. Kato, “Video games in health care: Closing the gap,” Rev. Gen. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 113–121, Jun. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019441
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Matamala-Gomez et al., “Telemedicine and Virtual Reality at Time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview for Future Perspectives in Neurorehabilitation,” Front Neurol, vol. 12, Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.646902
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Nuara, M. Fabbri-Destro, E. Scalona, S. E. Lenzi, G. Rizzolatti, and P. Avanzini, “Telerehabilitation in response to constrained physical distance: an opportunity to rethink neurorehabilitative routines,” J. Neurol., vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 627–638, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10397-w
dc.relation/*ref*/B. J. Hernández, P. Benjumea, and L. Tuso, “Indicadores del desempeño clínico fisioterapéutico en el manejo hospitalario temprano del accidente,” Revista Ciencias de la salud, vol. 11, no. 1, Apr. 2013. https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/revsalud/article/view/2456
dc.relation/*ref*/M. F. Montoya, J. F. Villada Villada, J. E. Muñoz Cardona, O. A. Henao Gallo, and J. F. López, “Diseño contextual para la creación de videojuego basado en Realidad Virtual usado en terapia de rehabilitación física en personas con accidente cerebrovascular,” Rev. EIA, vol. 19, no. 38, Jun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v19i38.1549
dc.relation/*ref*/J. F. Villada Castillo et al., “Design of Virtual Reality Exergames for Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Following Iterative Design Methods: Usability Study,” JMIR Serious Games, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e48900, Jan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2196/48900
dc.relation/*ref*/O. Espinosa, G. Puentes, J. Rodríguez, A. Robayo, and J.-M. Anaya, “Science, technology, and innovation in health for the next twenty years: A survey analysis in Colombia,” Health Care Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 78–87, Feb. 2024. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hcs2.87?src=getftr
dc.relation/*ref*/N. J. García Ríos, D. M. Sánchez Moriones, and O. L. Montoya Hurtado, “Estrategias de intervención de fisioterapia en neurorehabilitación utilizadas en Colombia: Revisión bibliográfica,” Mov. cient., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 60–66, May. 2015. https://revmovimientocientifico.ibero.edu.co/article/view/857
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Suárez-Escudero, S. Restrepo Cano, E. Ramírez, C. L. Bedoya, and I. Jiménez, “Descripción clínica, social, laboral y de la percepción funcional individual en pacientes con ataque cerebrovascular,” Acta Neurol. Colomb., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 97–105, Apr-Jun. 2011. https://www.actaneurologica.com/index.php/anc/article/view/1478/1175
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Sevcenko, and I. Lindgren, “The effects of virtual reality training in stroke and Parkinson’s disease rehabilitation: a systematic review and a perspective on usability,” European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, vol. 19, no. 1, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/S11556-022-00283-3
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Cormican, S. P. Hirani, and E. McKeown, “Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review,” Clin. Rehabil., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 701–712, May. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221141036
dc.relation/*ref*/F. A. Silva-Sieger, J. P. Garzón-Hernández, J. A. Mendoza-Sánchez, J. E. Arias, and C. Ortiz, “Costos directos asumidos por pacientes y gastos de bolsillo en ACV isquémico durante el primer año,” Rev. Salud Pública, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 1, Jul-Aug. 2021. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/revsaludpublica/article/view/91507
dc.relation/*ref*/I. Patsaki et al., “The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in physical recovery of stroke patients: A systematic review,” Front. Syst. Neurosci., vol. 16, Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.880447
dc.relation/*ref*/O. Espinosa, G. Puentes, J. Rodríguez, A. Robayo, and J.-M. Anaya, “Science, technology, and innovation in health for the next twenty years: A survey analysis in Colombia,” Health Care Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 78–87, Apr. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/HCS2.87
dc.relation/*ref*/R. Kapur, Digital platforms and transformation of healthcare organizations: Integrating digital platforms with advanced IT systems and work transformation. Boca Ratón, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003366584
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Powles, and H. Hodson, “Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms,” Health Technol, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 351–367, Dec. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-017-0179-1
dc.relation/*ref*/E. A. Moreno Vargas, K. Sánchez Acosta, L. A. Parada, J. Zuluaga, and H. Bayona Ortíz, “Análisis de costos de la atención hospitalaria en un paciente con fibrilación auricular no valvular y accidente cerebrovascular a repetición,” Acta Neurol. Colomb., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 139–147, Jul-Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.22379/24224022419
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Baatiema, A. de‐Graft Aikins, F. S. Sarfo, S. Abimbola, J. K. Ganle, and S. Somerset, “Improving the quality of care for people who had a stroke in a low‐/middle‐income country: A qualitative analysis of health‐care professionals’ perspectives,” Health Expectations, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 450–460, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13027
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Sampaio Silva, and E. Rocha, “Developing Systems of Care for Stroke in Resource-limited Settings,” Semin Neurol, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 119–129, Mar. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0044-1782617
dc.relation/*ref*/K. J. Bower, M. Verdonck, A. Hamilton, G. Williams, D. Tan, and R. A. Clark, “What factors influence clinicians’ use of technology in neurorehabilitation? A multisite qualitative study,” Phys. Ther., vol. 101, no. 5, May. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab031
dc.relation/*ref*/B. Ferreira, and P. Menezes, “Gamifying motor rehabilitation therapies: Challenges and opportunities of immersive technologies,” Information, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 88, Feb. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020088
dc.relation/*ref*/R. Proffitt, and B. Lange, “Considerations in the efficacy and effectiveness of virtual reality interventions for stroke rehabilitation: Moving the field forward,” Phys. Ther., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 441–448, Mar. 2015. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130571
dc.relation/*ref*/Y. Chen, K. Travis Abel, J. T. Janecek, Y. Chen, K. Zheng, and S. C. Cramer, “Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review,” Int J Med Inform., vol. 123, pp. 11–22, Mar. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.12.001
dc.relation/*ref*/N. W. Moon, P. Ma Baker, and K. Goughnour, “Designing wearable technologies for users with disabilities: Accessibility, usability, and connectivity factors,” Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, vol. 6, Aug. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668319862137
dc.relation/*ref*/J. L. Pérez Medina, P. Acosta-Vargas, and Y. Rybarczyk, “A systematic review of usability and accessibility in Tele-rehabilitation systems,” in Assistive and Rehabilitation Engineering, England, UK: IntechOpen, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85869
dc.relation/*ref*/I. Lehmann, G. Baer, and C. Schuster-Amft, “Experience of an upper limb training program with a non-immersive virtual reality system in patients after stroke: a qualitative study,” Physiotherapy, vol. 107, pp. 317–326, Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2017.03.001
dc.relation/*ref*/R.-C. Lin et al., “Effectiveness of early rehabilitation combined with virtual reality training on muscle strength, mood state, and functional status in patients with acute stroke: A randomized controlled trial,” Worldviews Evid. Based. Nurs., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 158–167, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12429
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Zanatta, A. Giardini, A. Pierobon, M. D’Addario, and P. Steca, “A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 22, p. 523, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07821-w
dc.relation/*ref*/R. Teasell et al., “Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. part one: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke; 6th edition update 2019,” Int. J. Stroke, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 763–788, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019897843
dc.relation/*ref*/R. Cano-de-la-Cuerda et al., “Economic Cost of Rehabilitation with Robotic and Virtual Reality Systems in People with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1531, Mar. Mar. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061531
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Fregna, N. Schincaglia, A. Baroni, S. Straudi, and A. Casile, “A novel immersive virtual reality environment for the motor rehabilitation of stroke patients: A feasibility study,” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 9, Aug. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.906424
dc.relation/*ref*/Z. Liu, L. Ren, C. Xiao, K. Zhang, and P. Demian, “Virtual Reality Aided Therapandtowards Health 4.0: A Two-Decade Bibliometric Analysis,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 1525, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19031525
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Veras et al., “Cost Analysis of a Home-Based Virtual Reality Rehabilitation to Improve Upper Limb Function in Stroke Survivors,” Global Journal Health Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 98, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v12n2p98
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Jonsdottir et al., “Virtual Reality for Motor and Cognitive Rehabilitation From Clinic to Home: A Pilot Feasibility and Efficacy Study for Persons With Chronic Stroke,” Front. Neurol., vol. 12, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.601131
dc.relation/*ref*/
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2024 TecnoLógicases-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 27 No. 61 (2024); e3180en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 27 Núm. 61 (2024); e3180es-ES
dc.source2256-5337
dc.source0123-7799
dc.subjectcost-effectivenessen-US
dc.subjectimmersionen-US
dc.subjectmedical physiotherapistsen-US
dc.subjectmotion healthen-US
dc.subjectspasticityen-US
dc.subjectrentabilidades-ES
dc.subjectinmersiónes-ES
dc.subjectfisioterapeutas médicoses-ES
dc.subjectsalud del movimientoes-ES
dc.subjectespasticidades-ES
dc.titleClinical Perceptions and Feasibility Analysis of a Virtual Reality Game for Post-Stroke Rehabilitationen-US
dc.titlePercepciones clínicas y análisis de factibilidad de un juego de realidad virtual para la rehabilitación Post-ACVes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeResearch Papersen-US
dc.typeArtículos de investigaciónes-ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Miniatura
Nombre:
3180-MPU-VF_v2_1.pdf
Tamaño:
1.29 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2256-5337-teclo-27-61-e207.xml
Tamaño:
172.31 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
344278917010.epub
Tamaño:
1.5 MB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
3560.html
Tamaño:
168.98 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista TecnoLógicas - Cosecha Portal de Revistas