Comparison and Validation of Models for the Design of Optimal Economic Pipe Diameters: A Case Study in the Anseba Region, Eritrea

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorArumugam, Aanandsundar
dc.creatorSubramani, Sobana
dc.creatorKibrom, Haben
dc.creatorGebreamlak, Medhanie
dc.creatorMengstu, Michael
dc.creatorTeame, Merhawit
dc.date2021-12-01
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:52:44Z
dc.descriptionAn optimal design for a pressurized flow pipe network is characterized by being economical and contributing the least amount of losses during water transmission through the system. The diameter of a pipe in a network system that delivers the desired effect with the minimum amount of waste and expenses is referred to as an optimal pipe size. The Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) model is widely recognized as the recommended standard technique to estimate the optimal pipe size for any pipe flow network system. Numerous empirical formulas have been proposed to simplify the computations required in this economic analysis model. This study seeks to compare the various empirical models that have been proposed by different authors based on a variety of physical variables involved in fluid flow dynamics. Eleven different empirical equations were chosen in order to select the optimal diameter for the network at the Hamelmalo Agricultural College farm located in the Anseba region of Eritrea for the distribution of water to the different sub-plots. The estimated diameters were compared to the standard diameter calculated using the standard LCCA method. This comparison was based on the estimated total head losses and economic analysis of the pipe diameters chosen for such network. Moreover, a statistical analysis was conducted to obtain the best-fit recommended modeled diameter for the network. The Bresse’s model performance was the most adequate when compared with the LCCA model.en-US
dc.descriptionUn diseño óptimo para una red de tuberías de flujo presurizado se caracteriza por ser económico y por evitar la menor cantidad de pérdidas durante la transmisión de agua a través del sistema. Por su parte, un tamaño de tubería óptimo hace referencia al diámetro de una tubería en un sistema de red que brinda el efecto deseado generando una cantidad mínima de desperdicios y gastos. El modelo de análisis del costo del ciclo de vida (LCCA, por sus siglas en inglés) es ampliamente reconocido como la técnica estándar recomendada para estimar el tamaño de tubería óptimo para cualquier sistema de red de tuberías. Se han propuesto múltiples fórmulas empíricas que buscan simplificar los cálculos inherentes en dicho modelo de análisis económico. El objetivo de este estudio consistió en comparar los modelos empíricos que varios autores han propuesto, a partir de diversas variables físicas involucradas en la dinámica del flujo de líquidos, con el fin de seleccionar el diámetro óptimo para la red en la granja del Hamelmalo Agricultural College, ubicada en la región de Anseba, en Eritrea,y su distribución de agua a las distintas subparcelas. Para ello se eligieron once ecuaciones empíricas diferentes. Los diámetros resultantes se compararon con el diámetro estándar calculado, utilizando, a su vez, el método estándar de análisis del costo del ciclo de vida. Dicha comparación se basó en la estimación de las pérdidas de carga total y el análisis económico de los diámetros de tubería elegidos para dicha red. Además, se realizó un análisis estadístico para obtener el diámetro modelado recomendado con el mejor ajuste para la red. El rendimiento del modelo de Bresse fue el más adecuado en comparación con el modelo LCCA.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1992
dc.identifier10.22430/22565337.1992
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7793
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM)es-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1992/2189
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1992/2192
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1992/2193
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1992/2205
dc.relation/*ref*/[[1] A. Sonowal; S. C. Senapati; S. Adamala, “A Mathematical Model for the Selection of an Economical Pipe Size in Pressurized Irrigation Systems”, Afr. J. Agric. Res, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 683-692, Feb. 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.10648
dc.relation/*ref*/R. W. Whitesides, “Selecting the Optimum Pipe Size” PDH Online Course M270 (12 PDH), 2012. https://pdhonline.com/courses/m270/m270content.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Bedjaoui; B. Achour; M.T. Bouziane, “NouvelleApprochePour Le Calcul du DiametreEconomiquedans les Conduites de Refoulement,” Courrier du Savoir, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 141-145, Jun. 2005. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/77967
dc.relation/*ref*/G. K. Roy, “Prediction of Optimum Economic pipe Diameter by Nomograph, Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 83-85, Jun. 1988. http://dspace.nitrkl.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/2080/953/1/gkroy%2060.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/J.N. Adams, “Quickly Estimate Pipe Sizing with ‘Jack’s Cube’”, Chemical Engineering Progress, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 55-58, Dec. 1997.
dc.relation/*ref*/F.M. Sani; S. Huizinga; K. A. Esaklul; S. Nesic, “Review of the API RP 14E Erosional Velocity Equation: Origin, Applications, Misuses, Limitations and Alternatives”, Wear, vol. 426-427, pp. 620-636, Apr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.119
dc.relation/*ref*/M. R. Sakr; E. A. Gooda, “Economical Velocity through Pipeline Networks ‘Case Studies of Several Different Markets’”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2999-3007, Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.05.001
dc.relation/*ref*/A. P. Savva; K. Frenken, “Planning, Development Monitoring and Evaluation of Irrigated Agriculture with Farmer Participation”, in Irrigation Manual, Southern Africa: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), vol. 2, no.7, 2002. https://www.fao.org/3/ai599e/ai599e.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/V. E. M. G. Diniz; P.A. Souza, “Four Explicit Formulae for Friction Factor Calculations in Pipe Flow”, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol.125, pp. 369-380, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/WRM090331
dc.relation/*ref*/J. L. Zocoler; F. C. B. Filho; L.A.F. Oliveira; F.B.T.Hernandez, “Model for determining Flow Diameter and Economic Velocity in Water Elevating Systems”, Math. Probl. Eng, vol. 2006, pp.1-17, Jun. 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/MPE/2006/17263
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Arumugam; H. Kibrom; M. Gebreamlak; M. Teame; M. Mengstu, “Modeling of Pipe diameter using Velocity Method for Pressurized Flow Pipe Network at Hamelmalo Agricultural College- A Case Study”, Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara- International Journal of Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 85-92, Aug. 2020. http://annals.fih.upt.ro/pdf-full/2020/ANNALS-2020-3-10.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Du; G. J. Woods; D. Kang; K.E. Lansey; R. G. Arnold, “Life Cycle Analysis for Water and Wastewater Pipe Materials”, Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 139, no.5, pp. 703-711, May. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000638
dc.relation/*ref*/S.J. Van Vuuren, “Application of genetic algorithms- Determination of the optimal pipe diameters”, Water SA, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 217-226, Mar. 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v28i2.4888
dc.relation/*ref*/R. H. Mohtar; V. F. Bralts; W. H. Shayya, “A Finite Element Model for the Analysis and Optimization of Pipe Networks”, Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 393-401, Mar. 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.31674
dc.relation/*ref*/A. R. Simpson; G. C. Dandy; L. J. Murphy, “Genetic Algorithms compared to other Techniques for Pipe Optimization”,J.WaterResour. Plan. Manag, vol.120, no. 4, pp. 423-443, Jul. 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:4(423)
dc.relation/*ref*/R. E. Featherstone; K.K. El-Jumaily, “Optimal Diameter selection for Pipe Networks”,Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 221-234, Feb. 1983. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:2(221)
dc.relation/*ref*/R. B. Shrestha et al., “Protocol for Reviving Springs in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: A Practitioner’s Manual”, International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, 2018. http://nhp.mowr.gov.in/docs/NHP/MISCELLANEOUS/MISCELLANEOUS/1271/SpringManual04-2018.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Folkman, “Validation of the long life of PVC Pipes”, In Proceedings of the 17th Plastic Pipes Conference PPXVII, Chicago, 2014, pp. 1-9. http://www.thinkpipesthinkpvc.com.au/images/pdfs/17_Plastic_Pipe_Conference/Steven_FOLKMAN_2A.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/B. K. Saleh; R. W. Kasili; E. G. Mamati; W. Araia; A. B. Nyende, “Classification of Local Pepper Collections (Capsicum spp.) from Eritrea using Morphological Traits”, Am. J. Plant Sci, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 590-600, Mar.2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.73052
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Omer et al., “Design of Optimal Irrigation Pipe Network for Hamelmalo Agricultural College Farm”, (Bachelor thesis), Department of Agricultural Engineering, Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Keren, 2013.
dc.relation/*ref*/R. D. Sonar; S. V. Alashi; D. C. Pawar; S. K. Deshmukh; S. H. Ambekar; T. M. Patil.,“Design and Manufacturing of PVC Pipe Chassis for Electric Cart”,IJARIIE, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 20-30, 2020.https://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/DESIGN_AND_MANUFACTURING_OF_PVC_PIPE_CHASSIS_FOR_ELECTRIC_CART_ijariie11490.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Engineering ToolBox, “Comparing Friction Loss in Steel, Copper and Plastic Pipes. Water flow and friction head loss (ft/100 ft) in steel, copper and PVC plastic pipes”, 2004. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/friction-loss-copper-steel-plastic-pipes-d_807.html
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Annan; E. A. Gooda, “Effect of Minor Losses during Steady Flow in Transmission Pipelines- Case Study ‘Water Transmission System Upgrade in Northern Saudi Arabia”, Alex. Eng. J, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 4299-4305, Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.12.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Kahramaa, “Principles for Water Network Design”, KAHRAMAA, Doha, 2014.
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Brkić; P. Praks, “Accurate and efficient explicit approximations of the Colebrook flow friction equation based on the Wright ω-Function”,Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-15, Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7010034
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Keller; R. D. Bliesner, Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.
dc.relation/*ref*/C. H. de Araujo Gama; V. C.Borges de Souza; N. H. Callado, “Analysis of Methodologies for Determination of the Economic Pipe Diameter”,RBRH,vol. 24, no. 35, pp. 1-8, Aug. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.241920180148
dc.relation/*ref*/B. G. Bataller, “Pipe and Tube Sizing”, Lecture on ChE 192”. https://dokumen.tips/documents/pipe-and-tube-sizing.html
dc.relation/*ref*/H. M. Paula, “Sistemas Prediais de combate a lncȇndio Hidrantes”, Departamento de Engenharia Civil Disciplina: Sistemas Prediais 2, Notas de Aula”, 2011.https://silo.tips/download/notas-de-aula-sistemas-prediais-de-combate-a-incendio-hidrantes
dc.relation/*ref*/S. B. Genić; B. M. Jaćimović; V. B. Genić, “Economic Optimization of pipe diameter for complete turbulence”, Energy and Buildings, vol.45, pp. 335-338, Feb. 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.054
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Bogawski; E. Bednorz, “Comparison and Validation of Selected Evapotranspiration Models for Conditions in Poland (Central Europe)”, Water Resources Management, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 5021-5038, Sep. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0787-8
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Alexandris; R. Stricevic; S. Petkovic, “Comparative analysis of reference evapotranspiration from the surface of rainfed grass in central Serbia, calculated by six empirical methods against the Penman-Monteith formula”, European Water, vol. 21/22, pp. 17-28, Jan. 2008. https://www.ewra.net/ew/pdf/EW_2008_21-22_02.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/C.J. Willmott; S. M. Robeson; K. Matsuura, “A refined index of model performance”, Int. J. Climatol, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 2088-2094, Sep. 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.2419
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Genić; I. Arandjelović; P. Kolendić; M. Jarić; N. Budimir; V. Genić, “A Review of Explicit approximations of Colebrook’s Equation”, FME Transactions, vol. 39, no. 2, pp.67-71, Jun. 2011. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1451-2092/2011/1451-20921102067G.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/A. P. de Camargo; B. Molle; S. Tomas; J. A. Frizzone, “Assessment of clogging effects on lateral hydraulics: proposing a monitoring and detection protocol”, Irrig Sci, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 181-191, Dec. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-013-0423-z
dc.relation/*ref*/A. P. de Camargo; P. C. Sentelhas, “Performance Evaluation of different potential Evapotranspiration estimating methods in the state of São Paulo, Brazil”, Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89-97, Jan. 1997. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=1230313
dc.relation/*ref*/M. H. Ali; I. Abustan, “A New Novel Index for Evaluating Model Performance”, Journal of Natural Resources and Development, vol. 4, pp. 1-9, Jan. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/jnrd.v4i0.01
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Netto; M. Fernández; Manual de hidráulica, 9th ed. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher Ltda, 2015.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 TecnoLógicases-ES
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 24 No. 52 (2021); e1992en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 24 Núm. 52 (2021); e1992es-ES
dc.source2256-5337
dc.source0123-7799
dc.subjectOptimal pipe size designen-US
dc.subjectPressurized flow networken-US
dc.subjectLife-cycle cost analysis modelen-US
dc.subjectEmpirical equation modelsen-US
dc.subjectStatistical analysisen-US
dc.subjectDiseño de tamaños de tubería óptimoes-ES
dc.subjectred de flujo presurizadoes-ES
dc.subjectmodelo de análisis del costo del ciclo de vidaes-ES
dc.subjectmodelos de ecuaciones empíricases-ES
dc.subjectanálisis estadísticoes-ES
dc.titleComparison and Validation of Models for the Design of Optimal Economic Pipe Diameters: A Case Study in the Anseba Region, Eritreaen-US
dc.titleComparación y validación de modelos para el diseño de diámetros óptimos económicos de tuberías: estudio de caso en la región de Anseba, Eritreaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeResearch Papersen-US
dc.typeArtículos de investigaciónes-ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Miniatura
Nombre:
revistatecnologicas_1992-MPUB-VF.pdf
Tamaño:
983.88 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_344268257007_1.epub
Tamaño:
2.75 MB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_344268257007.xml
Tamaño:
179.79 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2205.html
Tamaño:
230.53 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista TecnoLógicas - Cosecha Portal de Revistas