Knowledge Transfer and Calibration and Measurement Capabilities at National Metrology Laboratories

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorCastro-Galván, Esther
dc.creatorCázares-Garrido, Ilia Violeta
dc.date2022-01-30
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:48:53Z
dc.descriptionThe process of declaration of Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMCs) implies that National Metrology Laboratories (NMLs) must be continuously up to date on new topics, participate in international comparison programs to demonstrate their technical capabilities, and implement new measurement services derived from such comparisons. The absorptive capacity of an organization, in the context of dynamic capabilities, is the ability to identify the value of new external knowledge, assimilate it, and turn it into a commercial product. This absorptive capacity is an internal mechanism of an organization to evaluate how much of the external knowledge it can assimilate given its internal knowledge. The objective of this study is to evaluate the possible connection between CMCs and the development of new calibration services to propose them as indicators of the knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity of NMLs. Three national laboratories (in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina) were studied to conduct a descriptive analysis of their total CMC value in the period from 2001 to 2020 using the database of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Because public data are scarce, this article only described the declared capabilities and measurement services of Mexico’s NML, as well as their possible relationship with a growing number of new customers. It was concluded that the process of declaring CMCs is continuous and directly related to the creation of new measurement services and new customers. As a result, this article proposes said process as an indicator of an organization's knowledge transfer. However, future work should collect more empirical information for a subsequent in-depth analysis because no study so far has systematically investigated this process.en-US
dc.descriptionEl proceso de declaración de las capacidades de medición y calibración implica que de forma continua los laboratorios nacionales de metrología se actualicen en temas nuevos, participen en comparaciones internacionales para demostrar sus capacidades técnicas e implementen nuevos servicios de medición derivados de las comparaciones. La capacidad de absorción de una organización, en el contexto de las capacidades dinámicas, es la habilidad para identificar el valor de un nuevo conocimiento exterior, asimilarlo y convertirlo en un producto comercial. Esta capacidad de absorción es un mecanismo interno de una organización para poder evaluar cuánto del conocimiento externo es capaz de asimilar dados sus conocimientos internos. El objetivo de este estudio se centra en evaluar la posible conexión de las capacidades de medición y calibración con el desarrollo de nuevos servicios de calibración para proponerlos como indicadores de la transferencia del conocimiento y de la capacidad de absorción de los laboratorios nacionales de metrología. Se estudiaron tres laboratorios nacionales de México, Brasil y Argentina, para un análisis descriptivo del número total de CMC en el periodo de 2001 a 2020, utilizando la base de datos de la oficina internacional de pesas y medidas. Debido al escaso número de datos públicos, solo para México se relacionaron las capacidades declaradas con sus servicios de medición, así como la posible relación de crecimiento de nuevos clientes. Se encontró que el proceso de declaración de capacidades de medición y calibración es continuo y se relaciona directamente con la creación de nuevos servicios de medición y de nuevos clientes, por lo que se propone como un indicador de transferencia del conocimiento de la organización. Sin embargo, es necesario buscar más información empírica en un análisis posterior a profundidad debido a que actualmente no se han encontrado investigaciones que estudien este proceso sistemáticamente.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1834
dc.identifier10.22430/24223182.1834
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7043
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstitución Universitaria ITMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1834/2297
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1834/2298
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1834/2299
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1834/2334
dc.relation/*ref*/Banerjee S., Wahl, M. F., Panigrahi, J. K. (2018). Technology, innovation, and knowledge transfer: a value chain perspective. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, v. 9, n. 1, 1145-1161. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Supriya-Banerjee/publication/323071950_Technology_innovation_and_knowldege_transfer_A_value_chain_perspective/links/5a7dcb55aca272341af0d1dc/Technology-innovation-and-knowldege-transfer-A-value-chain-perspective.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Becerril Elías, J. C., Merrit, H. (2021). Alianzas para la innovación en organizaciones intensivas en conocimiento: el caso de México. Revista CEA, v. 7, n. 14, e1780. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.1780
dc.relation/*ref*/Bureau International des Poids et Mesure – BIPM. (2017). Procès-verbaux de la 106e session du Comité international des poids et mesures, 2017. https://www.bipm.org/en/search?p_p_id=search_portlet&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_search_portlet_javax.portlet.action=search&_search_portlet_page=1&_search_portlet_operation=changePage&p_p_lifecycle=0
dc.relation/*ref*/Bureau International des Poids et Mesure – BIPM. (2020a). CMC statistics. https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/cmc/statistics/public
dc.relation/*ref*/Bureau International des Poids et Mesure – BIPM. (2020b). Consultative Committees of the CIPM. https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc
dc.relation/*ref*/Bureau International des Poids et Mesure – BIPM. (2021a). Member States. https://www.bipm.org/en/member-states
dc.relation/*ref*/Bureau International des Poids et Mesure – BIPM. (2021b). The Metre Convention. https://www.bipm.org/en/metre-convention
dc.relation/*ref*/Bureau International des Poids et Mesure – BIPM. (2021c). Overview and implementation of the CIPM MRA. CIPM MRA P-11. Version 1.1. https://www1.bipm.org/documents/20126/43742162/CIPM-MRA-P-11.pdf/
dc.relation/*ref*/Castelazo, S. I. (2019). Orígenes del Centro Nacional de Metrología. Publicación conmemorativa a XXV años de su inauguración 1994-2019. Secretaría de Economía (SE)-CENAM. Gobierno de México.
dc.relation/*ref*/Centro Español de Metrología – CEM. (2011). ¿Qué es el Acuerdo de Reconocimiento Mutuo del Comité Internacional de Pesas y Medidas (CIPM)? https://www.cem.es/es/divulgacion/preguntas-frecuentes?text-fields=&field_faq_categoria_target_id=All&page=4
dc.relation/*ref*/Centro Nacional de Metrología – CENAM. (2020). Servicios. https://www.cenam.mx/servicios/
dc.relation/*ref*/Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 35, n. 1, 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
dc.relation/*ref*/Congreso General de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. (2020). Ley de Infraestructura de la Calidad. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5596009&fecha=01/07/2020
dc.relation/*ref*/Das, A. K., Chakraborty, S. (2018). Knowledge withholding within an organization: the psychological resistance to knowledge sharing linking with territoriality. RISUS Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, v. 9, n. 3, 94-108. https://doi.org/10.24212/2179-3565.2018v9i3p94-108
dc.relation/*ref*/Dei, D-G. J., van der Walt, T.B. (2020). Knowledge management practices in universities: The role of communities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, v. 2, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100025
dc.relation/*ref*/Doherty, V., Cormican, K. (2017). Analysis of knowledge transfer practices: Insights from a medical device manufacturing organization. Procedia Computer Science, v. 121, 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.026
dc.relation/*ref*/Dorostkar-Ahmadi, N., Shafiei Nikabadi, M., babaie-kafaki, S. (2022). Optimization of knowledge transferring costs in designing product portfolio: a fuzzy binary linear programming model. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, v. 52, n. 1, 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2020-0019
dc.relation/*ref*/entidad mexicana de acreditación – ema, (2020). Listado de laboratorios de calibración. http://catalogo.consultaema.mx:75/busqueda-laboratorios-de-calibracion
dc.relation/*ref*/Fioravanti, V. L. S., Stocker, F., Macau, F. (2021). Knowledge transfer in technological innovation clusters. Innovation & Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2020-0176
dc.relation/*ref*/Fruehauf, J., Kohun, F. G., Skovira, R. J. (2014). A discussion focusing on Polanyi´s “Tacit Knowing”. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, v. 3, n. 2, 100-113. http://www.iiakm.org/ojakm/articles/2015/volume3_2/OJAKM_Volume3_2pp100-113.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Fuller, L. P. (2021). Managing Peer-to-Peer Cooperation Using Knowledge-Based Trust and Encouraging the Willingness to Share Tacit Knowledge. Open Journal of Business and Management, v. 9, n. 3, 1246-1262. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.93067
dc.relation/*ref*/Gerbin, A., Drnovsek, M. (2020). Knowledge-sharing restrictions in the life sciences: personal and context-specific factors in academia-industry knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 24, n. 7, 1533-1557. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0651
dc.relation/*ref*/Gourlay, S. (2006) Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: A Critique of Nonaka’s Theory. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, n. 7, 1415-1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00637.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Hu, Y. F., Hou, J. L., Chien, C. F. (2019). A UNISON framework for knowledge management of university–industry collaboration and an illustration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.072
dc.relation/*ref*/Human, G. (2020). Linking absortive capacity, knowledge transfer and transactive memory. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, v. 36, n. 10, 1740-1754. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0060
dc.relation/*ref*/Ibidunni, A. S., Kolawole, A. I., Olokundun, M. A., Ogbari, M. E. (2020). Knowledge transfer and innovation performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs): An informal economy analysis. Heliyon, v. 6, n. 8, e04740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04740
dc.relation/*ref*/Intarakumnerd, P., Goto, A. (2018). Role of public research institutes in national innovation systems in industrialized countries: The cases of Fraunhofer, NIST, CSIRO, AIST, and ITRI. Research Policy, v. 47, n. 7, 1309-1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.011
dc.relation/*ref*/Ioi, T., Ono, M., Ishii, K., Kato, K. (2012). Analysis of a knowledge‐management‐based process of transferring project management skills. Campus-Wide Information Systems, v. 29, n. 4, 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211253840
dc.relation/*ref*/Isaacson, W. (2014). Los Innovadores. Los Genios que inventaron el futuro. Penguin Random House. http://esystems.mx/BPC/llyfrgell/0342.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Kapoor, M., Aggarwal, V. (2021). Comprehending a knowledge framework as a source of dynamic capabilities in IJVs through PLC-SEM. Journal of knowledge Management, v. 25, n. 4, 920-942. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2020-0212
dc.relation/*ref*/Kaschig, A., Maier, R., Sandow, A. (2016). The effects of collecting and connecting activities on knowledge creation in organizations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v. 25, n. 4, 243-258. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2016.08.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Kundapur, P. P., Rodrigues, L. L. R. (2017). Analysis of a Theoretical KMS Model Implementation in the Indian IT Sector Using PLS-SEM. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, v. 16, n. 1, 1750001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649217500010
dc.relation/*ref*/Li, H., Li, C., Wang, Z. (2021). An agent-based model for exploring the impacts of reciprocal trust on knowledge transfer within an organization. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, v. 36, n. 8, 1486-1503. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2019-0528
dc.relation/*ref*/Liebowitz, J., Paliszkiewicz, J. (2019). The next generation of knowledge management: Implications for LIS educators and professionals. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, v. 7, n. 2, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(2)16-28
dc.relation/*ref*/Link, A. N. (2021). The economics on metrology: an exploratory study of the impact of measurement science on U.S. productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v. 0, n. 0, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2021.1895905
dc.relation/*ref*/Londoño-Patiño, J. A., Acevedo-Álvarez, C. A. (2018). El aprendizaje organizacional (AO) y el desempeño empresarial bajo el enfoque de las capacidades dinámicas de aprendizaje. Revista CEA, v. 4, n. 7, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.762
dc.relation/*ref*/López-Portillo Romano, J. R. (2018). La gran transición. Retos y oportunidades del cambio tecnológico exponencial. Fondo de Cultura económico.
dc.relation/*ref*/López-Sáenz, P., Cruz-González, J., Navas-López, J. E., Perona-Alfageme, M. del M. (2021). Organizational integration mechanisms and knowledge transfer effectiveness in MNCs: The moderating role of cross-national distance. Journal of International Management, v. 27, n. 4, 100872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100872
dc.relation/*ref*/Marchiori, D., Franco, M. (2020). Knowledge transfer in the context of inter-organizational networks: Foundations and intellectual structures. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, v. 5, n. 2, 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.02.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Mato de la Iglesia, S. (2018). Transferencia del Conocimiento. Nuevo modelo para su prestigio e impulso. CRUE Universidades Españolas. https://www.crue.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2018.11.28-Transferencia-del-Conocimiento-DEFINITIVO_completo-digital.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/McMillan, C. J. (2016). Old wine in new bottles: docility, attention scarcity and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 20, n. 6, 1353-1372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0124
dc.relation/*ref*/Muñoz, C. A., Monsey, S., Binks, M. (2009). The Tacit Myster: Reconciling Different Approaches To Tacit Knowledge. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, v. 13, n. 3, 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.50
dc.relation/*ref*/Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/O’Leary, D. E. (2016) Is knowledge management dead (or dying)? Journal of Decision Systems, v. 25, n. sup1, 512-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1193930
dc.relation/*ref*/Omidvar, O., Edler, J., Malik, K. (2017). Development of absorptive capacity over time and across boundaries: The case of R&D consortia. Long Range Planning, v. 50, n. 5, 665-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.02.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Ozrudi, M. F., Aliabadib, S. R. (2014). Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Knowledge Management Among of PE Managers in Mazandaran Province Universities. Journal of Research in Applied sciences, v. 1, n. 3, 44-48. https://www.academia.edu/27366343/Relationship_Between_Organizational_Structure_and_Knowledge_Management_Among_of_PE_Managers_in_Mazandaran_Province_Universities
dc.relation/*ref*/Papa, A., Chierici, R., Ballestra, L. V., Meissner, D., Orhan, M. A. (2020). Harvesting reflecting knowledge Exchange for inbound open innovation in complex collaborative networks: an empirical verification in Europe. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 25, n. 4, 669-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0300
dc.relation/*ref*/Patriotta, G. (2004). On studying organizational knowledge. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, v. 2, n. 1, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500017
dc.relation/*ref*/Racko, G., Oborn, E., Barrett, M. (2019). Developing collaborative professionalism: an investigation status differentiation in academic organizations in knowledge transfer partnerships. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 30, n. 3, 457-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1281830
dc.relation/*ref*/Smith, M. K. (2003). Michael Polanyi and tacit knowledge. The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. https://infed.org/mobi/michael-polanyi-and-tacit-knowledge/
dc.relation/*ref*/Sudhindra, S., Ganesh, L. S., Arshinder, K. (2017). Knowledge transfer: an information theory perspective. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, v. 15, n. 3, 400-412. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0060-z
dc.relation/*ref*/Tunes, R., Reis Monteiro, P. R. (2017). Conhecimento em Gestão, Vantagem Competitiva e Performance Empresarial: Proposição e Teste de um Modelo Fundamentado na “Resource Advantage Theory” em MPEs. Revista Brasileira De Marketing, v. 16, n. 3, 298-316. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v16i3.3514
dc.relation/*ref*/Ulrich, D. (2017). Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft: Market concentration competition innovation strategies. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/152249
dc.relation/*ref*/Vega-González, L. R., Vega-Salinas, R. M. (2020). Plan para desarrollar redes de vinculación y gestión en Instituciones de I&D en Salud: estudio de caso. Revista CEA, v. 6, n. 12, 105-127. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.1504
dc.relation/*ref*/Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press. http://www.iot.ntnu.no/innovation/norsi-pims-courses/tushman/von%20Hippel%20(2005)%20-%20Democratizing%20innovation.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Watad, M. (2019). Organizational learning and change: can they coexist? Business Process Management Journal, v. 25, n. 5, 1070-1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2016-0240
dc.relation/*ref*/Wehn, U., Montalvo, C. (2018). Knowledge transfer dynamics and innovation: Behaviour, interactions, and aggregates outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 171, n. Supplement 10, S56-S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.198
dc.relation/*ref*/Zheng, X., Li, L., Zhang, F., Zhu, M. (2019). The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 5, 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051421
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitanoes-ES
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 8 No. 16 (2022); e1834en-US
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 8 Núm. 16 (2022); e1834es-ES
dc.source2422-3182
dc.source2390-0725
dc.subjectKnowledge transferen-US
dc.subjectcalibration and measurement capabilitiesen-US
dc.subjectnational laboratoriesen-US
dc.subjectabsorptive capacityen-US
dc.subjectmetrologyen-US
dc.subjecttechnical cooperationen-US
dc.subjecttransferencia de conocimientoes-ES
dc.subjectcapacidades de medición y calibraciónes-ES
dc.subjectlaboratorios nacionaleses-ES
dc.subjectcapacidad de absorciónes-ES
dc.subjectmetrologíaes-ES
dc.subjectcooperación técnicaes-ES
dc.titleKnowledge Transfer and Calibration and Measurement Capabilities at National Metrology Laboratoriesen-US
dc.titleLa transferencia del conocimiento y las capacidades de medición y calibración en laboratorios nacionales de metrologíaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Miniatura
Nombre:
revistacea_6_1834.pdf
Tamaño:
496.04 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_638169410010.epub
Tamaño:
561.03 KB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_638169410010.xml
Tamaño:
133.29 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2334.html
Tamaño:
151.46 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista CEA - Cosecha Portal de Revistas