Computational Comparison of AC and DC Motors to Hydrodynamic Changes in Marine Fishing Vessels

dc.creatorCorrea, Yineth Lorena
dc.creatorMuñoz, Iván Felipe
dc.creatorFranco Obando, Francisco
dc.creatorBueno Lopez, Maximiliano
dc.date2023-03-22
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:52:50Z
dc.descriptionThe objective of this article is to make a comparison in a computational environment between an alternating current motor and a direct current motor is made for dynamic variations in the propulsion of an artisanal fishing boat. Initially, the boat was simulated in the Maxsurf software to obtain the dynamic behaviors for pitching, rolling, yawing, and heave motions with wind and wave perturbations for a Pierson Moskowitz spectrum. Subsequently, the motors are selected and in Matlab/Simulink software and a torque behavior required by the vessel to act on the resistance presented in each dynamic motion is proposed. This allows for analyzing the required mechanical and electrical conditions, using the curves obtained in the simulation. Finally, it is concluded that taking into account the criteria of torque, power, speed, and current, the results obtained show that the DC motor is more efficient than the three-phase AC motor for artisanal fishing vessel applications. In addition, the two motors require greater effort to overcome the disturbance related to the rolling motion in the steady-state, while in the transient state the DC motor requires a higher starting torque and the AC motor presents oscillations, which are undesirable disturbances because they produce instability in the electrical system. Additionally, it is important to take into account the energy source that feeds the motors, which can be alternating current or direct current.en-US
dc.descriptionEl objetivo de este artículo fue realizar la comparación en un ambiente computacional entre un motor de corriente alterna y un motor de corriente continua ante variaciones dinámicas en la propulsión de una embarcación marítima de pesca artesanal. Inicialmente, se simuló la embarcación en el software Maxsurf con el objetivo de obtener los comportamientos dinámicos para los movimientos de cabeceo, balanceo, guiñada y oleaje con perturbaciones de viento y ola para un espectro de Pierson-Moskowitz. Posteriormente, se seleccionaron los motores en el software Matlab/Simulink, donde se propone un comportamiento de torque requerido por la embarcación para actuar ante la resistencia presentada en cada movimiento dinámico. Esto permitió analizar las condiciones mecánicas y eléctricas requeridas mediante las curvas obtenidas en la simulación. Finalmente, teniendo en cuenta los criterios de torque, potencia, velocidad, y corriente, los resultados obtenidos mostraron que el motor DC presenta mayor eficiencia que el motor AC trifásico para aplicaciones de buques de pesca artesanal. Además, se evidenció que los dos motores requieren mayor esfuerzo para vencer la perturbación relacionada al movimiento de balanceo en estado estable, mientras que, en el estado transitorio, el motor DC requiere un par de arranque mayor y el motor AC presenta oscilaciones, las cuales son perturbaciones indeseables debido a que producen inestabilidad en el sistema eléctrico. Es importante tener en cuenta la fuente energética que alimenta los motores que pueden ser de corriente alterna o corriente continua.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/2442
dc.identifier10.22430/22565337.2442
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7849
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM)es-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/2442/2793
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/2442/2818
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/2442/2819
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/2442/2820
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Prill, C. Behrendt, M. Szczepanek, and I. Michalska-Pożoga, “A new method of determining energy efficiency operational indicator for specialized ships,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 1082, Mar. 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051082
dc.relation/*ref*/S. F. Tie and C. W. Tan, “A review of energy sources and energy management system in electric vehicles,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 20, pp. 82–102, Apr. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.077
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Deja, R. Ulewicz, and Y. Kyrychenko, “Analysis and assessment of environmental threats in maritime transport,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 55, pp. 1073–1080, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.078
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Diab, H. Lan, and S. Ali, “Novel comparison study between the hybrid renewable energy systems on land and on ship,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 63, pp. 452–463, Sep. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.053
dc.relation/*ref*/T. Goh, S. Zhong, B. W. Ang, B. Su, S. H. Ng, and K. H. Chai, “Driving factors of changes in international maritime energy consumption: Microdata evidence 2014–2017,” Energy Policy, vol. 154, p. 112288, Jul. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112288
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Goldsworthy and B. Goldsworthy, “Modelling of ship engine exhaust emissions in ports and extensive coastal waters based on terrestrial AIS data - An Australian case study,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 63, pp. 45–60, Jan. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.009
dc.relation/*ref*/Y. Zhu, S. Zhou, Y. Feng, Z. Hu, and L. Yuan, “Influences of solar energy on the energy efficiency design index for new building ships,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 30, pp. 19389–19394, Jul. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.042
dc.relation/*ref*/C. C. Chan, "The State of the Art of Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 704-718, April 2007, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2007.892489
dc.relation/*ref*/J. L. Kirtley, A. Banerjee, and S. Englebretson, "Motors for Ship Propulsion," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 2320-2332, Dec. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2487044
dc.relation/*ref*/C. Nuchturee, T. Li, and H. Xia, “Energy efficiency of integrated electric propulsion for ships – A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 134, p. 110145, Dec. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110145
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Vargas-Machuca, Maquinas eléctricas rotativas. Lima, Perú, 1990.
dc.relation/*ref*/J -R. Riba, C. López-Torres, L. Romeral, and A. Garcia, “Rare-earth-free propulsion motors for electric vehicles: A technology review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 57, pp. 367–379, May. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.121
dc.relation/*ref*/O. F. C. Atalaya, N. Y. H. Ccallo, uis E. R. Vicuña, R. J. C. Ilizarbe, J. A. P. Torres, and J. J. F. R. Rupay, “Experimental Analysis in Alternate Current and Direct Current of the Operating Parameters of a Universal Single-Phase Engine,” Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 360–370, Jan. 2019, https://doi.org/10.25046/aj040646
dc.relation/*ref*/Y. Tanaka, S. Sakama, K. Nakano, and H. Kosodo, “Comparative Study on Dynamic Characteristics of Hydraulic, Pneumatic and Electric Motors,” in ASME/BATH 2013 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Oct. 2013, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1115/FPMC2013-4459
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Miyamasu and K. Akatsu, "Efficiency comparison between Brushless dc motor and Brushless AC motor considering driving method and machine design," in IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, Nov. 2011, pp. 1830-1835, https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2011.6119584
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Selvakumar, S. S. Menon, K. V. Kaushik, and D. Karthikeyan, “Electric Boat Propulsion System Using Multilevel Converter Based on ANN Controller,” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2S11, pp. 3319–3326, Sep. 2019, https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1560.0982S1119
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Sedef, A. Maheri, A. Daadbin, and M. Yilmaz, "A comparative study of the performance of DC permanent magnet and AC induction motors in urban electric cars," in 2012 2nd International Symposium On Environment Friendly Energies And Applications, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK, Jun. 2012, pp. 100-105, https://doi.org/10.1109/EFEA.2012.6294077
dc.relation/*ref*/R. Lateb, N. Takorabet, F. Meibody-Tabar, A. Mirzaian, J. Enon, and A. Sarribouette, "Performances comparison of induction motors and surface mounted PM motors for POD marine propulsion," in Fourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005, Hong Kong, China, Oct. 2005, vol. 2, pp. 1342-1349, https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2005.1518534
dc.relation/*ref*/B. Rexroth Corporation, “Electric, Hydraulics, Pneumatics: Evaluating Their Advantages for Automotive Manufacturing Processes,” Bosch Group, IL USA. 2006. https://pdfslide.net/documents/electric-hydraulics-pneumatics-evaluating-their-hydraulics-pneumatics-evaluating.html?page=5
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Ghimire, M. Zadeh, J. Thorstensen, and E. Pedersen, "Data-Driven Efficiency Modeling and Analysis of All-Electric Ship Powertrain: A Comparison of Power System Architectures," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1930-1943, June 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2021.3123886
dc.relation/*ref*/O. Simmonds, “DC: Is it the alternative choice for naval power distribution?,” Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 37–43, Dec. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2014.11658120
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Ghimire, D. Park, M. K. Zadeh, J. Thorstensen, and E. Pedersen, "Shipboard Electric Power Conversion: System Architecture, Applications, Control, and Challenges [Technology Leaders]," IEEE Electrification Magazine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 6-20, Dec. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/MELE.2019.2943948
dc.relation/*ref*/Y. -k. Son, S. -Y. Lee, and S. -K. Sul, "DC Power System for Fishing Boat," in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Chennai, India, Dec. 2018, pp. 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDES.2018.8707631
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Mulyana, F. Koeshardono, A. Sudradjat, and R. Y. Widiatmoko, “Optimization of B-series propeller geometry dimension to improve traditional fishing ship performance,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 830, no. 4, pp. 042035, Apr. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/4/042035
dc.relation/*ref*/T. N. Van, L. Thanh, and N. Natasa, “Measuring propeller pitch based on photogrammetry and CAD,” Manufacturing Technology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 706–713, Nov. 2021, https://doi.org/10.21062/mft.2021.070
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Tatiana and R. Ordo, “Sistema de generación híbrido basado en fuentes no convencionales de energía para pesca artesanal en el municipio de Guapi, Cauca,” Universidad del Cauca, 2021. http://repositorio.unicauca.edu.co:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5543
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Rubio Hervas, M. Reyhanoglu, H. Tang, and E. Kayacan, “Nonlinear control of fixed-wing UAVs in presence of stochastic winds,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 33, pp. 57–69, Apr. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.08.026
dc.relation/*ref*/X. Chen et al., “Infrared Ocean Image Simulation Algorithm Based on Pierson–Moskowitz Spectrum and Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function,” Photonics, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 166, Mar. 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9030166
dc.relation/*ref*/R. R. Torres Parra, S. Lonin, “Estudio del espectro de oleaje en el Caribe observado con boyas y su representación en el espectro Jonswap,” Boletín Científico CIOH, no. 25, pp. 8–18, Sep. 2007, https://doi.org/10.26640/01200542.25.8_18
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Bilec and C. D. Obreja, “Ship resistance and powering prediction of a fishing vessel,” in IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 916, no. 1, p. 012011, Sep. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/916/1/012011
dc.relation/*ref*/N. A. Maliky, N. P. Putra, M. T. Subarkah, and S. Hidayat, “Prediction of Vessel Dynamic Model Parameters using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation,” Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 926–936, Dec. 2020, https://doi.org/10.25046/aj0506110
dc.relation/*ref*/I. Fabregas Claramunt, “Estudio métodos de predicción de resistencia al avance,” (Trabajo fin de grado), Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería Náuticas, Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, 2018.
dc.relation/*ref*/W. Zhang, D. Jiang, and P. Li, “Design of Power and Energy System for a Small Garbage Cleaning Ship,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 603, pp. 012046, Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/603/1/012046
dc.relation/*ref*/Y. Bapodra and U. Rajamanickam2, “A review on Hybrid Electric Vehicle and simulation on Hybrid Electric Vehicle Drivetrain,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 633, p. 012007, Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/633/1/012007
dc.relation/*ref*/B. N. Abramovich, Y. A. Sychev, and P. A. Kuznetsov, “Modernization of gas-turbine engines with high- frequency induction motors,” IN IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 327, p. 052001, Mar. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/327/5/052001
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Pleßmann, M. Erdmann, M. Hlusiak, and C. Breyer, “Global Energy Storage Demand for a 100% Renewable Electricity Supply,” Energy Procedia, vol. 46, pp. 22–31, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.154
dc.relation/*ref*/
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 TecnoLógicases-ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 26 No. 56 (2023); e2442en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 26 Núm. 56 (2023); e2442es-ES
dc.source2256-5337
dc.source0123-7799
dc.subjectPitching motionen-US
dc.subjectYawing motionen-US
dc.subjectRolling motionen-US
dc.subjectWave motionen-US
dc.subjectHydrodynamic changesen-US
dc.subjectCambios hidrodinámicoses-ES
dc.subjectMovimientos de balanceo y oleajees-ES
dc.subjectMovimientos de cabeceoes-ES
dc.subjectMovimientos de guiñadaes-ES
dc.titleComputational Comparison of AC and DC Motors to Hydrodynamic Changes in Marine Fishing Vesselsen-US
dc.titleComparación computacional de motores AC y DC ante cambios hidrodinámicos en embarcaciones marítimas pesquerases-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeResearch Papersen-US
dc.typeArtículos de investigaciónes-ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2442-MPU-VF.pdf
Tamaño:
843.24 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
344273557009_2.epub
Tamaño:
1.96 MB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
344273557009.xml
Tamaño:
101.39 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2820.html
Tamaño:
139.48 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language