Sustainable Practices and Financial Performance in Latin America: An Analysis of Environmental Scores

dc.creatorOspina-Patiño, Camila
dc.creatorGonzález-Ruiz, Juan David
dc.creatorMarín-Rodríguez, Nini Johana
dc.date2023-09-30
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:49:12Z
dc.descriptionPurpose: This study explored the relationship between environmental scores and financial performance in Latin American firms. Design/Methodology: Using a dataset encompassing 1 708 observations from 372 firms between 2015 and 2020, this study employed panel data analysis to investigate the relationship between environmental scores and Return on Assets (ROA). Findings: The empirical findings indicate that the current environmental performance in Latin America has a limited impact on firms’ financial performance. However, positive results were observed in Brazil, Mexico, and Chile, where environmental practices and financial outcomes have been successfully integrated. Conclusions: By examining the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores, particularly environmental scores, on ROA in Latin American firms, this study contributes to better understanding the complex relationship between sustainability and financial performance in the region. In addition, it underscores both the challenges and opportunities that Latin American firms face in aligning environmental performance with profitability. According to the findings, enhanced strategies and mechanisms should be developed to bridge the gap between environmental and financial outcomes. While Latin America has made progress in establishing consensus on environmental practices, there remains a pressing need to develop robust strategies that effectively integrate sustainability and profitability. Originality: This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, investors, and firms seeking to navigate the interplay between sustainability and financial success in Latin America.en-US
dc.descriptionObjetivo: En este estudio, se investigó la relación entre las calificaciones ambientales y el desempeño financiero de las empresas latinoamericanas. Diseño/Metodología: Partiendo de un conjunto de datos que abarcó 1 708 observaciones de 372 empresas entre 2015 y 2020, este estudio utilizó datos de panel para analizar la relación entre las calificaciones ambientales y la rentabilidad de los activos. Resultados: Según los hallazgos empíricos, el impacto del actual desempeño ambiental en América Latina sobre el desempeño financiero de las empresas de la región es limitado. A pesar de ello, se observaron resultados positivos en Brasil, México y Chile, donde se destaca la exitosa integración de prácticas ambientales y resultados financieros. Conclusiones: Gracias al análisis del impacto de las calificaciones ambientales, sociales y de gobernanza—en particular las ambientales—sobre la rentabilidad de los activos de las empresas latinoamericanas, este estudio contribuye a una comprensión más profunda de la compleja relación entre la sostenibilidad y el desempeño financiero en la región. Además, destaca los retos y oportunidades que las empresas latinoamericanas enfrentan al momento de alinear su desempeño ambiental con su rentabilidad. De igual forma, pone de manifiesto la necesidad de desarrollar estrategias y mecanismos más efectivos para reducir la brecha entre los resultados en materia ambiental y financiera. A pesar de los avances logrados en América Latina en la consolidación de prácticas ambientales, persiste la apremiante necesidad de crear estrategias sólidas que integren de manera eficiente la sostenibilidad y la rentabilidad. Originalidad: Este estudio ofrece valiosas orientaciones para los responsables del diseño de políticas, inversionistas y empresas que desean comprender la interacción entre la sostenibilidad y el éxito financiero en América Latina.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2792
dc.identifier10.22430/24223182.2792
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7132
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano - ITMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2792/2961
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2792/3045
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2792/2984
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/2792/3026
dc.relation/*ref*/Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance, 20(7), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2020-0258
dc.relation/*ref*/Alcamo, J., Thompson, J., Alexander, A., Antoniades, A., Delabre, I., Dolley, J., Marshall, F., Menton, M., Middleton, J., & Scharlemann, J. P. W. (2020). Analysing interactions among the sustainable development goals: findings and emerging issues from local and global studies. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00875-x
dc.relation/*ref*/Alt, E., Díez-de-Castro, E. P., & Lloréns-Montes, F. J. (2015). Linking Employee Stakeholders to Environmental Performance: The Role of Proactive Environmental Strategies and Shared Vision. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-014-2095-X
dc.relation/*ref*/Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview. Academy of Management, 22(4), 45–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27747478
dc.relation/*ref*/Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
dc.relation/*ref*/Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2006.11.022
dc.relation/*ref*/Arango-Home, M. C., González-Ruiz, J. D., & Valencia-Arias, A. (2023). Relationship between Women on Board Directors and Economic Value Added: Evidence from Latin American Companies. Sustainability, 15(17), 13179. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713179
dc.relation/*ref*/Attah‐Boakye, R., Adams, K., Yu, H., & Koukpaki, A. S. F. (2022). Eco‐environmental footprint and value
dc.relation/*ref*/chains of technology multinational enterprises operating in emerging economies. Strategic Change, 31(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2479
dc.relation/*ref*/Barcellos de Paula, L., Palacio Vélez, S. L., Velásquez Ceballos, H., & Oquendo Trujillo, V. M. (2020). Exploring the Link between Environmental Practices and Financial Performance: An Empirical Study. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 23(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.47125/jesam/2020_2/04
dc.relation/*ref*/Bender, J., Bridges, T. A., & Shah, K. (2019). Reinventing climate investing: building equity portfolios for climate risk mitigation and adaptation. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 9(3), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2019.1579512
dc.relation/*ref*/Carpio, C., & Coviello, M. F. (2019). Eficiencia energética en América Latina y el Caribe: avances y desafíos del último quinquenio. Cepal.
dc.relation/*ref*/Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
dc.relation/*ref*/Chang, R., & Zhu, S. (2022). Probe into the Low-Carbon Economic Environment Challenges and Opportunities of Textile and Garment Export. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6043903
dc.relation/*ref*/Chen, C. C. (2005). Incorporating green purchasing into the frame of ISO 14000. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(9), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.04.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
dc.relation/*ref*/Cortez, M. C., Andrade, N., & Silva, F. (2022). The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence. Ecological Economics, 197, 107427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107427
dc.relation/*ref*/Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Delmas, M. A., Etzion, D., & Nairn-Birch, N. (2013). Triangulating environmental performance: What do corporate social responsibility ratings really capture? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0123
dc.relation/*ref*/Duque-Grisales, E., Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Guerrero-Villegas, J., & García-Sánchez, E. (2020). Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3286–3302. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2572
dc.relation/*ref*/Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1995). Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns. The Journal of Finance, 1(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6261.1995.TB05169.X
dc.relation/*ref*/Farza, K., Ftiti, Z., Hlioui, Z., Louhichi, W., & Omri, A. (2021). Does it pay to go green? The environmental innovation effect on corporate financial perfomance. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113695
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferrat, Y. (2021). Carbon emissions and firm performance: A matter of horizon, materiality and regional specificities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, 129743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129743
dc.relation/*ref*/Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. F. (2004). The Relationship between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 29(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000044602.86367.FF
dc.relation/*ref*/Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2012). Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1747
dc.relation/*ref*/Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Rubio, R., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2018). Environmental performance concerns in Latin America: Determinant factors and multivariate analysis. Revista de Contabilidad, 21(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2018.05.003
dc.relation/*ref*/González-Ruiz, J. D., Mejía-Escobar, J. C., Rojo-Suárez, J., & Alonso-Conde, A.-B. (2023). Green Bonds for Renewable Energy in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Energy Journal, 44(5). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.44.4.jgon
dc.relation/*ref*/Gürlük, S., Uzel, G., & Turan, Ö. (2015). Impacts of Cattle and Sheep Husbandry on Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Time Series Analysis for Central European Countries. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/30265
dc.relation/*ref*/Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Warnecke, C., Röser, F., Fekete, H., Hagemann, M., Day, T., Tewari, R., Kurdziel, M., Sterl, S., & Gonzales, S. (2017). The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions. Climate Policy, 17(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1218320
dc.relation/*ref*/Iwata, H., & Okada, K. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1691–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2011.05.010
dc.relation/*ref*/Johannsdottir, L., & McInerney, C. (2018). Developing and using a Five C framework for implementing environmental sustainability strategies: A case study of Nordic insurers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1252-1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Kaakeh, M., & Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2022). Environmental performance and financial perpormance during COVID-19 outbreak: Insight from Chinese firms. Frontiers in Enviromental Science, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.975924
dc.relation/*ref*/Korobeinikova, L. S., Tkacheva, M. V., & Korotkikh, V. V. (2021). Short-term predictive analysis of corporate environmental and financial performance. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practices, 20(12), 2226–2248. https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.20.12.2248
dc.relation/*ref*/Kumar, S., & Dua, P. (2021). Environmental management practices and financial performance: evidence from large listed Indian enterprises. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1877641
dc.relation/*ref*/Lee, M. T., & Suh, I. (2022). Understanding the effects of Environment, Social, and Governance conduct on financial performance: Arguments for a process and integrated modelling approach. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004
dc.relation/*ref*/Li, Y. (2014). Environmental innovation practices and performance: Moderating effect of resource commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.044
dc.relation/*ref*/Maditati, D. R., Munim, Z. H., Schramm, H.-J., & Kummer, S. (2018). A review of green supply chain management: From bibliometric analysis to a conceptual framework and future research directions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2018.08.004
dc.relation/*ref*/Marquez-Cardenas, V., Gonzalez-Ruiz, J. D., & Duque-Grisales, E. (2022). Board gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Latin America. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2(3), 785-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.2017256
dc.relation/*ref*/Mejia-Escobar, J.C., González-Ruiz, J.D., & Duque-Grisales, E. (2020). Sustainable financial products in the Latin America banking industry: Current status and insights. Sustainability, 12(14), 5648. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145648
dc.relation/*ref*/Mejía-Escobar, J. C. González-Ruiz, J.D., & Franco-Sepúlveda, G. (2021). Current State and Development of Green Bonds Market in the Latin America and the Caribbean. Sustainability, 13(19), 10872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910872
dc.relation/*ref*/Neori, A., Chopin, T., Troell, M., Buschmann, A. H., Kraemer, G. P., Halling, C., Shpigel, M., & Yarish, C. (2004). Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture, 231(1–4), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2003.11.015
dc.relation/*ref*/Nobanee, H., & Ellili, N. (2017). Impact of economic, environmental, and social sustainability reporting on financial performance of UAE banks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971484
dc.relation/*ref*/Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52(Part. B), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2015.09.019
dc.relation/*ref*/Nuzula, N. F. (2019). Does environmental cost affect Japanese Firms’ performance. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 4(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2019.v4i1.105
dc.relation/*ref*/Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use in Latin America. Evidence from Environmental Performance Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264309630-en
dc.relation/*ref*/Ortas, E., Álvarez, I., & Garayar, A. (2015). The environmental, social, governance, and financial performance effects on companies that adopt the United Nations Global Compact. Sustainability, 7(2), 1932–1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021932
dc.relation/*ref*/Ponce De Leon Barido, D., & Marshall, J. D. (2014). Relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions depends on income level and policy. Environmental Science and Technology, 48(7), 3632–3639. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405117n
dc.relation/*ref*/Ramirez, A. G., Monsalve, J., González-Ruiz, J. D., Almonacid, P., & Peña, A. (2022). Relationship between the Cost of Capital and Environmental, Social, and Governance Scores: Evidence from Latin America. Sustainability, 14(9), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14095012
dc.relation/*ref*/RDocumentation. (2022). VIF: Variance Inflation Factor. Packages and funcions. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/regclass/versions/1.6/topics/VIF
dc.relation/*ref*/Refinitiv. (2022). Environmental, Social and Governance Scores from Refinitiv. https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/refinitiv-esg-scores-methodology.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Ren, X., Li, Y., Shahbaz, M., Dong, K., & Lu, Z. (2022). Climate risk and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2021.12.023
dc.relation/*ref*/Rintala, O., Laari, S., Solakivi, T., Töyli, J., Nikulainen, R., & Ojala, L. (2022). Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance: the moderating role of ambidexterity in logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, 108479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108479
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodríguez-García, M. del P., Galindo-Manrique, A. F., Cortez-Alejandro, K. A., & Méndez-Sáenz, A. B. (2022). Eco-efficiency and financial performance in Latin American countries: An environmental intensity approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101547
dc.relation/*ref*/Rondinelli, D. A., & Berry, M. A. (1997). Case study: Sonoco’s materials reclamation improves environmental performance through quality-based management. Environmental Quality Management, 6(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/TQEM.3310060402
dc.relation/*ref*/Sarfraz, M., Ozturk, I., Yoo, S., Raza, M. A., & Han, H. (2023). Toward a new understanding of environmental and financial performance through corporate social responsibility, green innovation, and sustainable development. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01799-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Seyfang, G. (2010). Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7624–7633. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.10.027
dc.relation/*ref*/Sharma, R. B., Sharma, A., Ali, S., & Dadhich, J. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing and service industry. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 301. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0085
dc.relation/*ref*/Tao, H., Zhuang, S., Xue, R., Cao, W., Tian, J., & Shan, Y. (2022). Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121639. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121639
dc.relation/*ref*/Telle, K. (2006). “It pays to be green” - A premature conclusion? Environmental and Resource Economics, 35(3), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9013-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Tung, A., Baird, K., & Schoch, H. (2018). The effectiveness of using environmental performance measures. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 25(4), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2018.1506366
dc.relation/*ref*/United Nations. (2019). Report of the secretary-general on the 2019 climate action summit and the way forward in 2020. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/cas_report_11_dec_0.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.738
dc.relation/*ref*/Wamba, L. D. (2022). The determinants of environmental performance and its effect on the financial performance of European-listed companies. Journal of General Management, 47(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070211021050
dc.relation/*ref*/World Economic Forum. (2018). Driving the Sustainability of Production Systems with Fourth Industrial Revolution Innovation. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_39558_White_Paper_Driving_the_Sustainability_of_Production_Systems_4IR.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Wu, N., Xiao, W., Liu, W., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Corporate climate risk and stock market reaction to performance briefings in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(35), 53801–53820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19479-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Yang, D., Ni, B., & Wang, X. (2020). Heterogeneous Catalysts with Well-Defined Active Metal Sites toward CO2 Electrocat-alytic Reduction. Advanced Energy Materials, 10(25), 2001142. https://doi.org/10.1002/AENM.202001142
dc.relation/*ref*/Yang, M. G., Hong, P., & Modi, S. B. (2011). Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.017
dc.relation/*ref*/Yuan, F., & Gallagher, K. P. (2018). Greening Development Lending in the Americas: Trends and Determinants. Ecological Economics, 154, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.009
dc.relation/*ref*/Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Zhong, X., Yang, S., & Siddik, A. B. (2022). Do Green Banking Activities Improve the Banks’ Environmental Performance? The Mediating Effect of Green Financing. Sustainability, 14(2), 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14020989
dc.relation/*ref*/Zhang, Z., Malik, M. Z., Khan, A., Ali, N., Malik, S., & Bilal, M. (2022). Environmental impacts of hazardous waste, and management strategies to reconcile circular economy and eco-sustainability. Science of The Total Environment, 807(Part. 2), 150856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150856
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2023 Camila Ospina-Patiño, Juan David González-Ruiz, Nini Johana Marín-Rodríguezes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 9 No. 21 (2023); e2792en-US
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 9 Núm. 21 (2023); e2792es-ES
dc.source2422-3182
dc.source2390-0725
dc.subjectenvironmental performanceen-US
dc.subjectLatin Americaen-US
dc.subjectfinancial performanceen-US
dc.subjectESG scoreen-US
dc.subjectpanel dataen-US
dc.subjectROAen-US
dc.subjectdesempeño ambientales-ES
dc.subjectAmérica Latinaes-ES
dc.subjectdesempeño financieroes-ES
dc.subjectpuntuación ESGes-ES
dc.subjectdatos de paneles-ES
dc.subjectrentabilidad de los activoses-ES
dc.titleSustainable Practices and Financial Performance in Latin America: An Analysis of Environmental Scoresen-US
dc.titlePrácticas sostenibles y desempeño financiero en Latinoamérica: un análisis de las calificaciones ambientaleses-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
X_2792.pdf
Tamaño:
624.78 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
638175311014.epub
Tamaño:
1.1 MB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
638175311014.xml
Tamaño:
221.02 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
3026.html
Tamaño:
236.41 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language