Environmental Impact Assessment of the Bioprocesses on the Plantain Supply Chain in Mexico

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorAlonso Gómez, Leonardo A.
dc.creatorEstrada-Baltazar, Alejandro
dc.creatorMiramontes Martínez, Luis Ramiro
dc.date2026-05-21
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-26T16:18:37Z
dc.descriptionThe waste, by-products, and rejects generated in the processing, distribution, and sale of bananas are not optimally utilized. If not properly managed, this organic waste can cause serious environmental problems. Between 24% and 40% of bananas are not marketed and end up in landfills until they decompose, mainly because they do not comply with export regulations. Although it is feasible to use this waste to produce flour and bioethanol, it is necessary to evaluate the potential environmental consequences of these processes. This study assessed the environmental viability of flour and bioethanol production from immature plantain within the plantain production chain in Mexico, using life cycle analysis (LCA). The functional unit for the agronomic stage was 1 kg of plantain produced for direct sale. In contrast, for the industrial processes, 1 kg of flour produced was used as the functional unit, with bioethanol as a co-product. A sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the allocation between mass and economic value, while holding the total product flow constant across scenarios. E-LCA was performed using SimaPro 9.6.0.1 with ReCiPe Midpoint (H) v1.13 and Ecoinvent v3.3 data. Monte Carlo simulations modeled input uncertainty using probability distributions, enabling variability/sensitivity analysis to support robust environmental results. The results showed that the transport of inputs, together with the use of machinery, fertilizers, herbicides, and insecticides, has the most significant environmental impact during cultivation. In addition, the production of flour and bioethanol has substantial implications due to the complexity of the underlying technological processes. In conclusion, this work provides reliable environmental inventories and criteria to support decisions aimed at reducing environmental impacts in the banana marketing chain, thereby contributing to its sustainability and the circular economy.en-US
dc.descriptionLos subproductos generados en la cadena productiva del plátano no se aprovechan de manera óptima. Su mala gestión genera impactos ambientales graves. Entre el 24 % y el 40 % de los plátanos no se comercializan, principalmente por no cumplir con la normativa de exportación, y terminan en vertederos, donde se descomponen. Aunque es viable aprovechar estos residuos para producir harina y bioetanol, es necesario evaluar las posibles consecuencias ambientales de dichos procesos. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la viabilidad ambiental de la producción de harina y bioetanol a partir de plátano inmaduro en la cadena productiva del plátano en México, mediante el análisis del ciclo de vida (ACV). La unidad funcional para la etapa agronómica fue de 1 kg de plátano producido para la venta directa, mientras que, para los procesos industriales, se consideró 1 kg de harina producida, con el bioetanol como coproducto. Se realizó un análisis de sensibilidad variando la asignación entre masa y valor económico, considerando el flujo total de productos en cada escenario. La evaluación del ACV se realizó con SimaPro 9.6.0.1, el método ReCiPe Midpoint (H) v1.13 y la base de datos Ecoinvent v3.3. Las simulaciones de Monte Carlo modelaron la incertidumbre de los insumos mediante distribuciones probabilísticas, lo que permitió analizar la variabilidad y la sensibilidad para obtener resultados ambientales robustos. Los resultados mostraron que el transporte de insumos, junto con el uso de maquinaria, fertilizantes, herbicidas e insecticidas, genera el mayor impacto ambiental durante el cultivo. Además, la producción de harina y bioetanol conlleva impactos significativos debido a la complejidad de los procesos tecnológicos implicados. En conclusión, este trabajo aporta inventarios y criterios ambientales confiables para apoyar decisiones orientadas a reducir el impacto ambiental a lo largo de la cadena de comercialización del plátano, contribuyendo así a su sostenibilidad y a la economía circular.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3524
dc.identifier10.22430/22565337.3524
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/8148
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM)en-US
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3524/4077
dc.relation/*ref*/INEGI, “Censo Agropecuario (CA) 2022,” inegi.org, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ca/2022/
dc.relation/*ref*/Dirección General del Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera, “Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola,” nube.agricultura.gob, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://nube.agricultura.gob.mx/cierre_agricola/
dc.relation/*ref*/A. M. Afanador, “El banano verde de rechazo en la producción de alcohol carburante,” Rev. EIA, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 51-68, Jan.-Jun. 2013. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-12372005000100005
dc.relation/*ref*/L. A. Bello‐Pérez, F. J. Pineda‐Tapia, G. Pacheco‐Vargas, R. Carmona‐Garcia, and J. Tovar, “Whole Unripe Plantain Flour as Unconventional Carbohydrate Source to Prepare Gluten‐Free Pasta with High Dietary Fiber Content and Reduced Starch Hydrolysis,” Starch, vol. 76, no. 1-2, Jan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.202200222
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Kunyanee, T. Van Ngo, S. Kusumawardani, and N. Luangsakul, “Enhancing Banana Flour Quality through Physical Modifications and Its Application in Gluten-Free Chips Product,” Foods, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 593, Feb. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13040593
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Tibiru Apaliya et al., “Effect of different drying methods on the rehydration kinetics, physiochemical and functional properties of unripe plantain (Musa parasidiaca) flour,” Food Chem. Adv., vol. 4, p. 100610, Jun. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2024.100610
dc.relation/*ref*/L. A. Alonso‐Gómez, E. Heredia‐Olea, S. O. Serna‐Saldivar, and L. A. Bello‐Pérez, “Whole unripe plantain (Musa paradisiaca L.) as raw material for bioethanol production,” J. Sci. Food Agric., vol. 99, no. 13, pp. 5784-5791, Oct. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9847
dc.relation/*ref*/L. A. Alonso-Gómez, J. C. Solarte-Toro, L. A. Bello-Pérez, and C. A. Cardona-Alzate, “Performance evaluation and economic analysis of the bioethanol and flour production using rejected unripe plantain fruits (Musa paradisiaca L.) as raw material,” Food Bioprod. Process., vol. 121, pp. 29-42, May. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2020.01.005
dc.relation/*ref*/J.-F. Mercure et al., “System complexity and policy integration challenges: The Brazilian Energy- Water-Food Nexus,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 105, pp. 230-243, May. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.045
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Hoxha, and M. J. Taherzadeh, “Sustainable Valorization of Plant-Derived Agri-Food Side-Streams Through Fungal Biorefinery: Supporting Bioeconomy Strategy,” Curr. Pollution Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 8, Dec. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-026-00399-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, ISO 14040:2006, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Piedrahita-Rodríguez, S. Cardona Urrea, D. A. Escobar García, M. Ortiz-Sánchez, J. C. Solarte-Toro, and C. A. Cardona Alzate, “Life cycle assessment and potential geolocation of a multi-feedstock biorefinery: Integration of the avocado and plantain value chains in rural zones,” Bioresour. Technol. Rep., vol. 21, p. 101318, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101318
dc.relation/*ref*/C. A. García, M. Morales, J. Quintero, G. Aroca, and C. A. Cardona, “Environmental assessment of hydrogen production based on Pinus patula plantations in Colombia,” Energy, vol. 139, pp. 606-616, Nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.012
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Veliz, L. Chico-Santamarta, and A. D. Ramirez, “The Environmental Profile of Ecuadorian Export Banana: A Life Cycle Assessment,” Foods, vol. 11, no. 20, p. 3288, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11203288
dc.relation/*ref*/N. Suppen-Reynaga, A. B. Guerrero, E. R. Dominguez, E. Sacayón, and A. Solano, “Life cycle assessment of bananas, melons, and watermelons from Costa Rica,” Clean. Circ. Bioecon., vol. 9, p. 100120, Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100120
dc.relation/*ref*/A. F. da S. Lima et al., “Carbon and water scarcity footprints of banana under current and future climate conditions in the Brazilian semiarid region,” Environ. Dev., vol. 51, p. 101034, Sep. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101034
dc.relation/*ref*/Z. Rozaki et al., “Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Banana Farming in Yogyakarta Special Region Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA),” Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodynamics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 159-167, Jan. 2025. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.200117
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Coltro, and T. U. Karaski, “Environmental indicators of banana production in Brazil: Cavendish and Prata varieties,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 207, pp. 363-378, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.258
dc.relation/*ref*/Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Panorama Agroalimentario 2025, Dirección General del Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera, Ciudad de México, México, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://nube.agricultura.gob.mx/panorama_dgsiap/2025.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/E. Agama-Acevedo, J. A. Sañudo-Barajas, R. Vélez De La Rocha, G. A. González-Aguilar, and L. A. Bello-Peréz, “Potential of plantain peels flour (Musa paradisiaca L.) as a source of dietary fiber and antioxidant compound,” CyTA. J. Food, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 117-123, Jan. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2015.1055306
dc.relation/*ref*/S. S. Cronauer, and A. D. Krikorian, “Multiplication of Musa from Excised Stem Tips,” Ann. Bot., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 321-328, Mar. 1984. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086696
dc.relation/*ref*/Z. Shen et al., “Suppression of banana Panama disease induced by soil microbiome reconstruction through an integrated agricultural strategy,” Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 128, pp. 164-174, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.10.016
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Rocha dos Santos, S. L. Rodrigues. Donato, A. De Magalhães Arantes, E. F. Coelho, and P. M. De Oliveira, “Gas exchange in ‘BRS Princesa’ banana (Musa spp.) under partial rootzone drying irrigation in the north of Minas Gerais, Brazil,” Acta Agron., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 378-384, Jul. 2017. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v66n3.55056
dc.relation/*ref*/Y. Zhang et al., “Soil Acidification caused by excessive application of nitrogen fertilizer aggravates soil-borne diseases: Evidence from literature review and field trials,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 340, p. 108176, Dec. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108176
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Muscalu, C. Sorică, C. Persu, A.-M. Andrei, A. Dorogan, and C. Tudora, “Researches on ecological weed control in vegetable crops,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 112, p. 03008, Aug. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911203008
dc.relation/*ref*/V. Sánchez, F. J. López-Bellido, M. A. Rodrigo, F. J. Fernández, and L. Rodríguez, “A mesocosm study of electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation of atrazine-polluted soils,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 233, p. 116044, Feb. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116044
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Lohaus, and S. Vidal, “Nitrogen supply in conventional versus organic farming systems: effects on the performance of cereal aphids,” Org. Agr., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 129-139, Jun. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-013-0051-1
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Manzo‐Sánchez et al., “Genetic variability of Pseudocercospora fijiensis, the black Sigatoka pathogen of banana (Musa spp.) in Mexico,” Plant Pathol., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 513-522, Apr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12965
dc.relation/*ref*/R. Swennen, and E. De Langhe, “Growth Parameters of Yield of Plantain (Musa cv. AAB),” Ann. Bot., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 197-204, Aug. 1985. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087003
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Munro-Olmos, R. Vasquez-Castrejon, A. Romero, and J. Figueroa, “Paquete tecnológico para el cultivo del Plátano en Colima,” 2012, Gobierno del Estado de Colima, Secretaría de Desarrollo Rural de Colima. [Online]. Available: https://es.scribd.com/document/804856854/270988103-Paquete-Tecnologico-Del-Platano
dc.relation/*ref*/W. J. Orts, and C. M. McMahan, “Biorefinery Developments for Advanced Biofuels from a Sustainable Array of Biomass Feedstocks: Survey of Recent Biomass Conversion Research from Agricultural Research Service,” Bioenerg. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 430-446, Jun. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9732-4
dc.relation/*ref*/T. Nemecek, and T. Kägi, “Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems,” Ecoinvent Report. vol. 2, no. 15, pp. 1-360, Jan. 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263239333_Life_Cycle_Inventories_of_Agricultural_Production_Systems
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Rossier, and R. Charles, Ecobilan: Adaptation de la méthode écobilan pour la gestion environnementale de l’exploitation agricole (S. romand de vulgarisation agricole Lausanne), Lausanne, SWI: SRVA, Service romand de vulgarisation agricole, 1998. https://bib.rero.ch/global/documents/392009
dc.relation/*ref*/R. Dalgaard, N. Halberg, and J. E. Hermansen, “Danish pork production an environmental assessment,” DJF Anim. Sci., no. 88, pp. 1-38, Nov. 2007. https://2-0-lca.com/publications/show/danish-pork-production-an-environmental-assessment/
dc.relation/*ref*/R. M. Altarawneh, “Levels of selected heavy metals (Pb, Ni, Cd, and Cr) in various widely consumed fruits and vegetables in Jordan,” Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 1026-1033, May. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2019.1675653
dc.relation/*ref*/S. K. Gupta, F. A. Ansari, M. Nasr, M. Chabukdhara, and F. Bux, “Multivariate analysis and health risk assessment of heavy metal contents in foodstuffs of Durban, South Africa,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 190, no. 3, p. 151, Mar. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6546-1
dc.relation/*ref*/V. Aristizábal-Marulanda, C. A. García-Velásquez, and C. A. Cardona Alzate, “Environmental assessment of energy-driven biorefineries: The case of the Coffee Cut-Stems (CCS) in Colombia,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 26, pp. 290-310, Feb. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01855-0
dc.relation/*ref*/SimaPro 9.6. Full update instructions, PRé Sustainability, Amersfoort, The Netherlands, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://simapro.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/FullUpdateInstructionsToSimaPro960.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Wernet, C. Bauer, B. Steubing, J. Reinhard, E. Moreno-Ruiz, and B. Weidema, “The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1218-1230, Sep. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
dc.relation/*ref*/R. H. Hafyan et al., “Integrated biorefinery for bioethanol and succinic acid co-production from bread waste: Techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 301, p. 118033, Feb. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.118033
dc.relation/*ref*/G. H. Klein et al., “Utilization of banana peel waste for the production of bioethanol and other high-value-added compounds,” Food Human., vol. 3, p. 100376, Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100376
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Balcerek, U. Dziekońska-Kubczak, K. Pielech-Przybylska, A. Oleszczak, M. Koń, and A. M. Patelski, “Waste Bread as Raw Material for Ethanol Production: Effect of Mash Preparation Methods on Fermentation Efficiency,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 20, p. 9565, Jan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209565
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Demichelis, M. Laghezza, M. Chiappero, and S. Fiore, “Technical, economic and environmental assessement of bioethanol biorefinery from waste biomass,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 277, p. 124111, Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124111
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Kayanda Kiteto, B. Minayo Vidija, and C. Achisa Mecha, “Production of bioethanol from citrus peel waste: A techno – economic feasibility study,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 26, p. 100916, Apr. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100916
dc.relation/*ref*/S. González-García, P. Comendador Morales, and B. Gullón, “Estimating the environmental impacts of a brewery waste–based biorefinery: Bio-ethanol and xylooligosaccharides joint production case study,” Ind. Crops Prod., vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 331-340, Nov. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.003
dc.relation/*ref*/V. Ieremia, E. Loiseau, and A. Geeraerd Ameryckx, “Benchmarking the environmental impacts of Leuven’s urban food system using territorial Life Cycle Assessment: What we eat matters the most,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 135, p. 106966, Dec. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106966
dc.relation/*ref*/C. Salas-Vargas, L. Brunett-Pérez, V. E. Espinosa-Ortiz, and C. G. Martínez-García, “Environmental impact of Oaxaca cheese production and wastewater from artisanal dairies under two scenarios in Aculco, State of Mexico,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 311, p. 127586, Aug. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127586
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Babu et al., “Designing energy-efficient, economically sustainable and environmentally safe cropping system for the rainfed maize–fallow land of the Eastern Himalayas,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 722, p. 137874, Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137874
dc.relation/*ref*/R. M. de Souza, D. Seibert, H. B. Quesada, F. de Jesus Bassetti, M. R. Fagundes-Klen, and R. Bergamasco, “Occurrence, impacts and general aspects of pesticides in surface water: A review,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 135, pp. 22-37, Mar. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.12.035
dc.relation/*ref*/M. A. Liñan-Cabello, A. L. Quintanilla-Montoya, C. Sepúlveda-Quiroz, and O. D. Cervantes-Rosas, “Anthropogenic Susceptibility to environmental variability of the aquaculture sector in the State of Colima, Mexico: case study,” Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 649-656, Feb. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol44-issue3-fulltext-24
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Chopin, J. Tirolien, and J.-M. Blazy, “Ex-ante sustainability assessment of cleaner banana production systems,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 139, pp. 15-24, Dec. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.036
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Bonales-Revuelta, R. Musule, F. S. Navarro-Pineda, and C. A. García, “Evaluating the environmental performance of orange production in Veracruz, Mexico: A life cycle assessment approach,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 343, p. 131002, Apr. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131002
dc.relation/*ref*/L. P. Güereca, A. Padilla-Rivera, and N. Aguilar-Rivera, “Life cycle assessment of nine representative agroindustrial systems of sugar production in Mexico,” Food and Bioprod. Process., vol. 131, pp. 164-175, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2021.11.001
dc.relation/*ref*/A. López-Sánchez et al., “Food loss in the agricultural sector of a developing country: Transitioning to a more sustainable approach. The case of Jalisco, Mexico.,” Environ. Chall., vol. 5, p. 100327, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100327
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Ortiz-Sanchez, and C. A. Cardona Alzate, “Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of orange peel waste in present productive chains,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 322, p. 128814, Nov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128814
dc.relation/*ref*/J. C. Solarte-Toro, M. Ortiz-Sanchez, and C. A. Cardona Alzate, “Environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA) and social impact assessment (SIA) of small-scale biorefineries implemented in rural zones: the avocado (Persea Americana var. Americana) case in Colombia,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 8790-8808, Jun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20857-z
dc.relation/*ref*/Global Energy Monitor, “Perfil energético: México,” gem.wiki, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.gem.wiki/Perfil_energ%C3%A9tico:_M%C3%A9xico
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Banacloche, Y. Lechon, and A. Rodríguez-Martínez, “Carbon capture penetration in Mexico’s 2050 horizon: A sustainability assessment of Mexican CCS policy,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 115, p. 103603, Mar. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103603
dc.relation/*ref*/Manual del Usuario Modelo Mexicano de Biogás 2.0., Agencia para la Protección del Ambiente (U.S. EPA), Washington, United States, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://globalmethane.org/documents/models/pdfs/manual_del_usuario_modelo_mexicano_de_biogas_v2_2009.pdf
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2026 TecnoLógicasen-US
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 29 No. 66 (2026); e3524en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 29 Núm. 66 (2026); e3524es-ES
dc.source2256-5337
dc.source0123-7799
dc.subjectbioetanoles-ES
dc.subjecteconomía circulares-ES
dc.subjectimpacto ambientales-ES
dc.subjectanálisis de ciclo de vidaes-ES
dc.subjectsostenibilidades-ES
dc.subjectbioethanolen-US
dc.subjectcircular economyen-US
dc.subjectenvironmental impacten-US
dc.subjectlife cycle analysisen-US
dc.subjectsustainabilityen-US
dc.titleEnvironmental Impact Assessment of the Bioprocesses on the Plantain Supply Chain in Mexicoen-US
dc.titleEvaluación del impacto ambiental de los bioprocesos de la cadena de suministro del plátano en Méxicoes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeResearch Papersen-US
dc.typeArtículos de investigaciónes-ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
3524_Diagramado_v3.pdf
Tamaño:
951.23 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista TecnoLógicas - Cosecha Portal de Revistas