Blockchain for Ensuring Integrity and Traceability in the Chain of Custody of Digital Evidence in Computer Forensics: A Systematic Mapping Study

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorVaca, Pablo Andrés
dc.creatorDulce-Villarreal, Edgar Roberto
dc.date2024-08-01
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:53:13Z
dc.descriptionThe incorporation of blockchain as a strategy to improve information security in various sectors of society has been identified as a potential solution to reduce the risks associated with data processing on the Internet. Ensuring chain of custody in forensic investigations is essential to preserve the record and provenance of digital evidence. However, the lack of research on the development and implementation of solutions that integrate blockchain for chain of custody hinders its application and adoption. Therefore, this research aimed to classify the characteristics of blockchain that allow to guarantee the integrity and traceability of digital evidence in the chain of custody process, through a literature review based on a Systematic Mapping Study. The study described the concepts and current status of the blockchain in relation to chain of custody. The findings revealed various frameworks, proofs of concept, prototypes, and protocols that proposed blockchain applications in the recording, exchange, and traceability of digital evidence in different contexts and the benefits, limitations, and challenges associated with their implementation. As a final conclusion, it highlights the close relationship between integrity and traceability as fundamental properties for the construction of blockchain applications and provides a solid foundation of information that can serve as a reference for future research.en-US
dc.descriptionLa incorporación de blockchain como estrategia para mejorar la seguridad de la información en diversos sectores de la sociedad se ha identificado como una potencial solución para reducir los riesgos asociados con el tratamiento de datos en Internet. Garantizar la cadena de custodia en investigaciones forenses es esencial para preservar el registro y procedencia de la evidencia digital. No obstante, la falta de investigación en el desarrollo e implementación de soluciones que integren blockchain para la cadena de custodia dificulta su aplicación y adopción. Por ello, esta investigación tuvo como objetivo clasificar las características de blockchain que permiten garantizar la integridad y trazabilidad de la evidencia digital en el proceso de cadena de custodia, mediante una revisión de literatura basada en un Estudio de Mapeo Sistemático. El estudio describió los conceptos y estado actual de blockchain en relación con la cadena de custodia. Los hallazgos revelaron diversos marcos, pruebas de concepto, prototipos y protocolos que propusieron aplicaciones de blockchain en el registro, intercambio y trazabilidad de evidencia digital en diferentes contextos, así como los beneficios, limitaciones y desafíos asociados con su implementación. Como conclusión final, se destaca la estrecha relación entre integridad y trazabilidad como propiedades fundamentales para la construcción de aplicaciones blockchain, además de proporcionar una base sólida de información que pueda servir de referencia para futuras investigaciones.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3049
dc.identifier10.22430/22565337.3049
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7905
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM)es-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3049/3307
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3049/3429
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3049/3540
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/3049/3541
dc.relation/*ref*/N. Rane, S. Choudhary, and J. Rane, “Enhanced Product Design and Development Using Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), 4D/5D/6D Printing, Internet of Things (IoT), and Blockchain: A Review,” SSRN Electron. J., Nov. 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4644059
dc.relation/*ref*/Sakshi, A. Malik, and A. K. Sharma, “Blockchain-based digital chain of custody multimedia evidence preservation framework for internet-of-things,” J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 77, p. 103579, Sep. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2023.103579
dc.relation/*ref*/W. Bank, "The Digital-Climate Nexus," In Green Digital Transformation: How to Sustainably Close the Digital Divide and Harness Digital Tools for Climate Action. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023, pp. 1–23. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/40653
dc.relation/*ref*/H. Koppisetty, K. Potdar, and S. Jain, “Cyber-crime, Forensics and use of Data Mining in Cyber Space: A Survey,” in 2019 International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), Tirunelveli, India, 2019, pp. 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT46314.2019.8987921
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Musa Bade, and S. H. Othman, “Towards Adapting Metamodelling Technique for an Online Social Networks Forensic Investigation (OSNFI) Domain,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 13, no. 7, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130722
dc.relation/*ref*/Á. MacDermott, T. Baker, P. Buck, F. Iqbal, and Q. Shi, “The Internet of Things: Challenges and Considerations for Cybercrime Investigations and Digital Forensics,” Int. J. Digit. Crime Forensics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2020. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJDCF.2020010101
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Ombu, “Role of Digital Forensics in Combating Financial Crimes in the Computer Era,” J. Forensic Account. Prof., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57–75, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2478/jfap-2023-0003
dc.relation/*ref*/C. Chen, and B. Dong, “Digital forensics analysis based on cybercrime and the study of the rule of law in space governance,” Open Comput. Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, May. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/comp-2022-0266
dc.relation/*ref*/T. D’Anna et al., “The Chain of Custody in the Era of Modern Forensics: From the Classic Procedures for Gathering Evidence to the New Challenges Related to Digital Data,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 634, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050634
dc.relation/*ref*/A. A. Khan, M. Uddin, A. A. Shaikh, A. A. Laghari, and A. E. Rajput, “MF-Ledger: Blockchain Hyperledger Sawtooth-Enabled Novel and Secure Multimedia Chain of Custody Forensic Investigation Architecture,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 103637–103650, Jul. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3099037
dc.relation/*ref*/T. M. jawad, “Adoption of Chain of Custody Improves Digital Forensic Investigation Process,” Iraqi J. Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 13–23, Jul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.31987/ijict.1.2.14
dc.relation/*ref*/ISO/IEC 27037:2012 - Information technology — Security techniques — Guidelines for identification, collection, acquisition and preservation of digital evidence, 27037:2012, ISO/IEC, Swiss, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/44381.html
dc.relation/*ref*/J. G. Nortjé, and D. C. Myburgh, “The Search and Seizure of Digital Evidence by Forensic Investigators in South Africa,” Potchefstroom Electron. Law J., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–42, Apr. 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4886
dc.relation/*ref*/N. M. Karie, V. R. Kebande, H. S. Venter, and K.-K. R. Choo, “On the importance of standardising the process of generating digital forensic reports,” Forensic Sci. Int. Reports, vol. 1, p. 100008, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2019.100008
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Li, T. Qin, and G. Min, “Blockchain-Based Digital Forensics Investigation Framework in the Internet of Things and Social Systems,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1433–1441, Dec. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2019.2927431
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Pestana, W. Antunes, and J. Carvalho, “Digital Chain of Custody Operational Framework,” in 2023 IEEE International Workshop on Technologies for Defense and Security (TechDefense), Rome, Italy, 2023, pp. 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1109/TechDefense59795.2023.10380890
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Awuson-David, T. Al-Hadhrami, M. Alazab, N. Shah, and A. Shalaginov, “BCFL logging: An approach to acquire and preserve admissible digital forensics evidence in cloud ecosystem,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 122, pp. 1–13, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.03.001
dc.relation/*ref*/D. D. Pawlaszczyk, M. Bochmann, P. Engler, C. Klaver, and C. Hummert, “API-based evidence acquisition in the cloud - a survey [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations],” Open Res. Eur., vol. 2, no. 69, May. 2022. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14784.1
dc.relation/*ref*/C. Karagiannis, and K. Vergidis, “Digital Evidence and Cloud Forensics: Contemporary Legal Challenges and the Power of Disposal,” Information, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 181, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12050181
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Mannix, A. Gorey, D. O’Shea, and T. Newe, “Sensor Network Environments: A Review of the Attacks and Trust Management Models for Securing Them,” J. Sens. Actuator Networks., vol. 11, no. 3, p. 43, Aug. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan11030043
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Rasmi Al-Mousa, “Generic Proactive IoT Cybercrime Evidence Analysis Model for Digital Forensics,” in 2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), Amman, Jordan, 2021, pp. 654-659. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT52682.2021.9491718
dc.relation/*ref*/T. D’Anna et al., “The Chain of Custody in the Era of Modern Forensics: From the Classic Procedures for Gathering Evidence to the New Challenges Related to Digital Data,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 634, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050634
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Banwani, and Y. Kalra, “Maintaining and Evaluating the Integrity of Digital Evidence in Chain of Custody,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 90–96, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.c6449.0910321
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Li, C. Lal, M. Conti, and D. Hu, “LEChain: A blockchain-based lawful evidence management scheme for digital forensics,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 115, pp. 406–420, Feb. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.09.038
dc.relation/*ref*/O. Olukoya, “Distilling blockchain requirements for digital investigation platforms,” J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 62, p. 102969, Nov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2021.102969
dc.relation/*ref*/S. K. Rana et al., “Decentralized Model to Protect Digital Evidence via Smart Contracts Using Layer 2 Polygon Blockchain,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 83289–83300, Aug. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3302771
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” Decentralized Bus. Rev., Mar. 2008. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/M. M. Khubrani, “Mobile Device Forensics, challenges and Blockchain-based Solution,” in 2023 Second International Conference On Smart Technologies For Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), Singapore, 2023, pp. 1504-1509. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartTechCon57526.2023.10391719
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Rao, S. Fernandes, S. Raorane, and S. Syed, “A Novel Approach for Digital Evidence Management Using Blockchain,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Recent Adv. Comput. Tech., Amsterdam, 2020, pp. 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683280
dc.relation/*ref*/P.A. Vaca, and E.R. Dulce-Villarreal, “El rol de la tecnología Blockchain para garantizar la integridad y trazabilidad al proceso de cadena de custodia: Un estudio de mapeo sistemático,” in Congreso Andino Computación, Informática y Educación - CACIED 2023, 2023. [sin publicar]
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, and M. Mattsson, “Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering,” in 12th Int. Conf. Eval. Assess. Softw. Eng., Italy, 2008, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8
dc.relation/*ref*/S.-M. Guerrero-Calvache, and G. Hernández, “Conceptions and Perceptions of Software Industry Professionals on Team Productivity in Agile Software Development: A Comparative Study,” Rev. Fac. Ing., vol. 30, no. 58, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v30.n58.2021.13817
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Petticrew, and H. Roberts, "Starting the Review: Refining the Question and Defining the Boundaries," In Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2008, pp. 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
dc.relation/*ref*/B. Kitchenham, and S. M. Charters, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” University Durham, UK, Technical Report EBSE 2007-001. 2007. https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/EDAG684W
dc.relation/*ref*/T. Dyba, T. Dingsoyr, and G. K. Hanssen, “Applying Systematic Reviews to Diverse Study Types: An Experience Report,” in First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007), Madrid, Spain, 2007, pp. 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.59
dc.relation/*ref*/T. Meline, “Selecting Studies for Systemic Review: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 33, pp. 21–27, Mar. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_33_S_21
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Guerrero-Calvache, and G. Hernández, Team Productivity in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study, vol. 1643 CCIS. Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19647-8_32
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Batista et al., “Exploring Blockchain Technology for Chain of Custody Control in Physical Evidence: A Systematic Literature Review,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 16, no. 8, p. 360. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080360
dc.relation/*ref*/O. Revelo-Sánchez, C. A. Collazos-Ordoñez, and J. A. Jimenez-Toledo, “La Gamificación como estrategia didáctica para la enseñanza/aprendizaje de la programación: un mapeo sistemático de literatura,” Lámpsakos, no. 19, pp. 31–46, Jan- Jun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.21501/21454086.2347
dc.relation/*ref*/E. R. D. Villarreal, J. García-Alonso, E. Moguel, and J. A. H. Alegría, “Blockchain for Healthcare Management Systems: A Survey on Interoperability and Security,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 5629–5652, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3236505
dc.relation/*ref*/W. Yan, J. Shen, Z. Cao, and X. Dong, “Blockchain Based Digital Evidence Chain of Custody,” in Proceedings of the 2020 The 2nd International Conference on Blockchain Technology, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3390566.3391690
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Ali, A. Ismail, H. Elgohary, S. Darwish, and S. Mesbah, “A Procedure for Tracing Chain of Custody in Digital Image Forensics: A Paradigm Based on Grey Hash and Blockchain,” Symmetry, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 334, Feb. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020334
dc.relation/*ref*/L. Ahmad, S. Khanji, F. Iqbal, and F. Kamoun, “Blockchain-Based Chain of Custody: Towards Real-Time Tamper-Proof Evidence Management,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3407023.3409199
dc.relation/*ref*/P. López-Aguilar, and A. Solanas, “An Effective Approach to the Cross-Border Exchange of Digital Evidence Using Blockchain,” in Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society, S. Saponara, A. de Gloria, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95498-7_19
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Santamaría, L. Tobarra, R. Pastor-Vargas, and A. Robles-Gómez, “Smart Contracts for Managing the Chain-of-Custody of Digital Evidence: A Practical Case of Study,” Smart Cities, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 709–727, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020034
dc.relation/*ref*/B. M. Manjre, and K. K. Goyal, “A novel and custom blockchain approach for the integrity assurance of the digital evidences extracted during the extraction and decoding of mobile artifacts from the mobile forensic tools,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, Nagpur, India, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0127910
dc.relation/*ref*/Sarishma, A. Gupta, and P. Mishra, “Blockchain based framework to maintain chain of custody (CoC) in a forensic investigation,” in Communications in Computer and Information Science, M. Singh et al., Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81462-5_4
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Chopade, S. Khan, U. Shaikh, and R. Pawar, “Digital Forensics: Maintaining Chain of Custody Using Blockchain,” in 2019 Third International conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), Palladam, India, 2019, pp. 744-747. https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC47947.2019.9032693
dc.relation/*ref*/A. H. Lone, and R. N. Mir, “Forensic-chain: Blockchain based digital forensics chain of custody with PoC in Hyperledger Composer,” Digit. Investig., vol. 28, pp. 44–55, Mar. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Sunardi, and R. S. Kusuma, “Digital Evidence Security System Design Using Blockchain Technology,” Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 159–165, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.130118
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Bonomi, M. Casini, and C. Ciccotelli, “B-CoC: A blockchain-based chain of custody for evidences management in digital forensics,” in International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols (Tokenomics), Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Paris, 2020, pp. 12:1-12:15. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.Tokenomics.2019.12
dc.relation/*ref*/O. W. Salami, M. B. Abdulrazaq, E. A. Adedokun, and B. Yahaya, “Collaborative Integrity Verification for Blockchain-Based Cloud Forensic Readiness Data Protection,” in Informatics and Intelligent Applications, S. Misra, J. Oluranti, R. Damaševičius, and R. Maskeliunas, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95630-1_10
dc.relation/*ref*/H. Al-Khateeb, G. Epiphaniou, and H. Daly, “Blockchain for modern digital forensics: The chain-of-custody as a distributed ledger,” in Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, H. Jahankhani, S. Kendzierskyj, A. Jamal, G. Epiphaniou, and H. Al-Khateeb, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11289-9_7
dc.relation/*ref*/T. Martin, and M. Hammoudeh, “Data Preservation System Using BoCA: Blockchain-of-Custody Application,” in The 5th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems, New York, NY, USA, 2022, pp. 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3508072.3508084
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Shahaab, C. Hewage, and I. Khan, “Preventing Spoliation of Evidence with Blockchain: A Perspective from South Asia,” in 2021 The 3rd International Conference on Blockchain Technology, New York, NY, USA, 2021, pp. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460537.3460550
dc.relation/*ref*/X. Burri, E. Casey, T. Bollé, and D.-O. Jaquet-Chiffelle, “Chronological independently verifiable electronic chain of custody ledger using blockchain technology,” Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig., vol. 33, p. 300976, Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.300976
dc.relation/*ref*/T. Fu-Ching, “The application of blockchain of custody in criminal investigation process,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 192, pp. 2779–2788, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.048
dc.relation/*ref*/E. Dulce, and J. Hurtado, “The Role of the Blockchain Technology in the Elderly Care Solutions: A Systematic Mapping Study,” in Gerontechnology III, J. García-Alonso, and C. Fonseca, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72567-9_3
dc.relation/*ref*/J. Chen, X. Xia, D. Lo, J. Grundy, and X. Yang, “Maintaining Smart Contracts on Ethereum: Issues, Techniques, and Future Challenges,” 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.00286
dc.relation/*ref*/V. Dhillon, D. Metcalf, and M. Hooper, “The Hyperledger Project,” in Blockchain Enabled Appl., Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2017, pp. 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3081-7_10
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Habib, S. Sharma, S. Ibrahim, I. Ahmad, S. Qureshi, and M. Ishfaq, “Blockchain technology: benefits, challenges, applications, and integration of blockchain technology with cloud computing,” Futur. Internet, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 341, Nov. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14110341
dc.relation/*ref*/Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H.-N. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, “Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey,” Int. J. Web Grid Serv., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 352–375, Oct. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647
dc.relation/*ref*/W. Gao, W. G. Hatcher, and W. Yu, “A Survey of Blockchain: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges,” in 2018 27th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN), Hangzhou, China, 2018, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2018.8487348
dc.relation/*ref*/
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2024 TecnoLógicases-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 27 No. 60 (2024); e3049en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 27 Núm. 60 (2024); e3049es-ES
dc.source2256-5337
dc.source0123-7799
dc.subjectblockchaines-ES
dc.subjectcadena de custodiaes-ES
dc.subjectevidencia digitales-ES
dc.subjectinformática forensees-ES
dc.subjectintegridad de los datoses-ES
dc.subjectblockchainen-US
dc.subjectchain of custodyen-US
dc.subjectdigital evidenceen-US
dc.subjectdigital forensicsen-US
dc.subjectdata integrityen-US
dc.titleBlockchain for Ensuring Integrity and Traceability in the Chain of Custody of Digital Evidence in Computer Forensics: A Systematic Mapping Studyen-US
dc.titleBlockchain para asegurar la integridad y trazabilidad en la cadena de custodia de evidencia digital en informática forense: un estudio de mapeo sistemáticoes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeReview Articleen-US
dc.typeArtículos de revisiónes-ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Miniatura
Nombre:
3049-MPU-VF_v3_1.pdf
Tamaño:
768.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2256-5337-teclo-27-60-e300.xml
Tamaño:
156.47 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
344277854005.epub
Tamaño:
1.47 MB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
3541.html
Tamaño:
248.04 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista TecnoLógicas - Cosecha Portal de Revistas