Influence of Religiosity, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Consumer Effectiveness on Socially Responsible Consumption

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.creatorMejía, Juan Camilo
dc.creatorCurrás-Pérez, Rafael
dc.creatorCórdoba-Segovia, Carlos Manuel
dc.date2021-05-30
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T23:48:53Z
dc.descriptionThis study analyzes the influence of consumer religiosity, subjective norm, and perceived effectiveness on the intention to purchase socially responsible products. It applied empirical research based on a questionnaire administered to 485 participants in Colombia and Spain (divided in equal proportions). To evaluate the results, a structural equation model was created based on the Partial Least Squares (PLS) technique. The results of the two countries presented similarities; more specifically, religiosity influences the dimensions of responsible consumption in both places. In addition, the importance of the subjective norm in this type of consumption was confirmed. However, the hypothesis that related perceived consumer effectiveness and this kind of purchase was not supported. These results show the importance of the role of religiosity in responsible consumption intentions, mainly due to its symbolic and socializing function as an element of acculturation and expression of identity. Likewise, this paper expands the theory of planned behavior because it explores the subjective norm in this type of purchase. Further studies in this area should investigate responsible consumption and the factors that influence it and propose marketing strategies to strengthen it in favor of the environment, society, and the finances of organizations.en-US
dc.descriptionEsta investigación analizó la relación entre religiosidad, norma subjetiva y efectividad percibida del consumidor en la intención de compra de productos socialmente responsables. La investigación empírica se basó en un cuestionario repartido, en igual proporción, a 485 personas ubicadas en Colombia y España. Para su evaluación se realizó un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales a partir de la técnica Partial Least Square (PLS). Se encontró similitud en los resultados entre ambos países, comprobándose, en los dos casos, la influencia de la religiosidad sobre las dimensiones de consumo responsable. También se pudo determinar la importancia de la norma subjetiva sobre este tipo de consumo. Sin embargo, no fue posible comprobar la hipótesis que relacionaba la efectividad percibida por el consumidor en este tipo de compras. Con estos resultados se concluyó acerca de la importancia del papel de la religiosidad en las intenciones de consumo responsable, debido, principalmente, a su función simbólica y socializadora como elemento de aculturación y de expresión de identidad. Asimismo, fue posible ampliar la teoría del comportamiento planificado al explorar la norma subjetiva en este tipo de compras. El estudio sugirió investigaciones sobre consumo responsable y sus factores influyentes, y propuso estrategias de marketing para fortalecerlo en favor del medio ambiente, la sociedad y la economía de las organizaciones.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formattext/xml
dc.formattext/html
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1809
dc.identifier10.22430/24223182.1809
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12622/7041
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano - ITMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1809/2010
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1809/2033
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1809/2017
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1809/2049
dc.relation/*ref*/Abutaleb, S.; El-Bassiouny, N. M.; Hamed, S. (2020). A conceptualization of the role of religiosity in online collaborative consumption behavior. Journal of Islamic Marketing, v. 12, n. 1, 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2019-0186
dc.relation/*ref*/Agarwala, R.; Mishra, P.; Singh, R. (2019). Religiosity and consumer behavior: A summarizing review. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, v. 16, n. 1, 32-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2018.1495098
dc.relation/*ref*/Aguirre, R. (1988). El evangelio como juicio a la cultura del consumo. Sal Terrae, v. 4, 265-274.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ajzen, H.; Fishbein, M. (1980). Predicting and Understanding Consumer Behavior: Attitude-Behavior Correspondence. En Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. (Eds.). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (148-172). Prentice Hall.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, v. 50, n. 2, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
dc.relation/*ref*/Akremi, A.; Smaoui, F. (2015). Socially responsible consumption in emerging markets: ¿do cultural values and religiosity matter? En Vrontis, D.; Weber, Y; Tsoukatos, E. (Eds.), 8th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business (p. 46-83). EuroMed Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Allen, C. T. (1982). Self-Perception Based Strategies for Stimulating Energy Conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 8, n. 4, 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1086/208878
dc.relation/*ref*/Anderson, J.; Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, v. 103, n. 3, 411. https://insights.ovid.com/plbul/198805000/00006823-198805000-00011
dc.relation/*ref*/Anderson, W. T.; Henion, K. E.; Cox, E. P. (1974). Socially vs. ecologically responsible consumers. En AMA Combined Conference Proceedings (v. 36, pp. 304-311).
dc.relation/*ref*/Angelidis, J.; Ibrahim, N. (2004). An exploratory study of the impact of degree of religiousness upon an individual's corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of business ethics, n. 51, 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033606.27489.bf
dc.relation/*ref*/Antil, J. H. (1984), Socially Responsible Consumers: Profile and Implications for Public Policy. Journal of Macromarketing, v. 4, n. 2, 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678400400203
dc.relation/*ref*/Awad, T. A. (2011). Environmental segmentation alternatives: buyers' profiles and implications. Journal of Islamic Marketing, v. 2, n. 1, 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831111115240
dc.relation/*ref*/Baazeem, T.; Mortimer, G.; Neale, L. (2016). Conceptualising the relationship between shopper religiosity, perceived risk and the role of moral potency. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, v. 15, n. 5, 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1583
dc.relation/*ref*/Berger, I. E.; Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, v. 11, n. 2, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569201100208
dc.relation/*ref*/Bermeo-Giraldo, M. C.; Álvarez-Agudelo, L.; Ospina-Rúa, M. I.; Acevedo-Correa, Y.; Montoya-Restrepo, I. A. (2019). Factores que influyen en la intención de uso de las tarjetas de crédito por parte de los jóvenes universitarios. Revista CEA, v. 5, n. 9, 77-96. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.1257
dc.relation/*ref*/Bidegain Greising, A. M.; Demera Vargas, J. D. (2005). Globalización y diversidad religiosa en Colombia (Vol. 34). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation/*ref*/Bratt, C. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and behavior, v. 31, n. 5, 630-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972272
dc.relation/*ref*/Bray, J.; Johns, N.; Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 98, n. 4, 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9
dc.relation/*ref*/Chai, L. T.; Tan, B. C. (2010). Towards socially responsible consumption: Investigating the effect of religiosity and money ethics. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, v. 1, n. 1, 32-35. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2010.V1.6
dc.relation/*ref*/Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. En Marcoulides, G. A. (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (295–358). Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cosgel, M. M.; Minkler, L. (2004). Religious identity and consumption. Review of Social Economy, v. 62, n. 3, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034676042000253945
dc.relation/*ref*/Davari, A.; Iyer, P.; Strutton, D. (2017). Investigating moral links between religiosity, altruism, and green consumption. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, v. 29, n. 4, 385-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2017.1326338
dc.relation/*ref*/De Pelsmacker, P.; Driesen, L.; Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee. Journal of consumer affairs, v. 39, n. 2, 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Delener, N. (1990). The Effects of Religious Factors on Perceived Risk in Durable Goods Purchase Decisions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, v. 7, n. 3, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002580
dc.relation/*ref*/Delener, N. (1994). Religious contrasts in consumer decision behaviour patterns: their dimensions and marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, v. 28, n. 5, 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569410062023
dc.relation/*ref*/Ekström, K. M. (1995). Children’s influence in family decision making: A study of yielding, consumer learning, and consumer socialization. [Tesis de doctorado, Göteborg University]. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/10751
dc.relation/*ref*/Ellen, P. S.; Wiener, J. L.; Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of public policy & marketing, v. 10, n. 2, 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000206
dc.relation/*ref*/Felix, R.; Braunsberger, K. (2016). I believe therefore I care: the relationship between religiosity, environmental attitudes, and green product purchase in Mexico. International Marketing Review, v. 33, n. 1, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-07-2014-0216
dc.relation/*ref*/Fink, A. (2003). The survey handbook. Sage Publications.
dc.relation/*ref*/Fornell, C; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, n. 1, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
dc.relation/*ref*/François‐Lecompte, A.; Valette‐Florence, P. (2006). Mieux connaître le consommateur socialement responsable. Décisions Marketing, n. 41, 67–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40593054
dc.relation/*ref*/Gold, A.; Malhotra, A.; Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 18, n. 1, 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
dc.relation/*ref*/Granzin, K. L.; Olsen, J. E. (1991). Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: A focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, v. 10, n. 2, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000201
dc.relation/*ref*/Guzmán Facundo, F. R.; García Salas, B. A.; Rodríguez Aguilar, L.; Alonso Castillo, M. M. (2014). Actitud, norma subjetiva y control conductual como predictores del consumo de drogas en jóvenes de zona marginal del norte de México. Frontera Norte, v. 26, n. 51, 53-74. https://doi.org/10.17428/rfn.v26i51.556
dc.relation/*ref*/Hair, J. F.; Anderson, R. E.; Tatham, R. L.; Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
dc.relation/*ref*/Halman, L.; Luijkx, R.; Van Zundert, M. (2005). Atlas of European Values (European values studies). Brill Academic Pub.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hassan, S.H. (2014). The role of Islamic values on green purchase intention. Journal of Islamic Marketing, v. 5, n. 3, 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2013-0080
dc.relation/*ref*/Hoge, R. (1972). A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, v. 11, n. 4, 369-376. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384677
dc.relation/*ref*/Holotová, M.; Nagyová, Ľ.; Holota, T. (2020). The impact of environmental responsibility on changing consumer behaviour–sustainable market in Slovakia. Economics & Sociology, v. 13, n. 3, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-3/6
dc.relation/*ref*/Hunt, S. D.; Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of macromarketing, v. 26, n. 2, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146706290923
dc.relation/*ref*/Jones, J. J.; Reilly, T. M.; Cox, M. Z.; Cole, B. M. (2017). Gender makes a difference: Investigating consumer purchasing behavior and attitudes toward corporate social responsibility policies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v. 24, n. 2, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1401
dc.relation/*ref*/Kalamas, M.; Cleveland, M.; Laroche, M. (2014). Pro-environmental behaviors for thee but not for me: Green giants, green Gods, and external environmental locus of control. Journal of Business Research, v. 67, n. 2, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Katz-Gerro, T.; Meier Jaeger, M. (2012). Religion, religiosity, and cultural stratification: theoretical links and empirical evidence. En Keister, L. A.; Mccarthy, J.; Finke, R. (Eds.) Religion, Work and Inequality (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 23, pp. 337-366), Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-2833(2012)0000023017
dc.relation/*ref*/Khan, M. N.; Kirmani, M. D. (2018). Role of religiosity in purchase of green products by Muslim students: Empirical evidences from India. Journal of Islamic Marketing, v. 9, n. 3, 504-526. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2017-0036
dc.relation/*ref*/Khraim, H. (2010). Measuring Religiosity in Consumer Research from an Islamic Perspective. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, v. 26, n. 1, 52-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/10264116201000003
dc.relation/*ref*/Kinnear, T. C.; Taylor, J. R.; Ahmed, S. A. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: who are they? Ecologically concerned consumers can be identified. Journal of marketing, v. 38, n. 2, 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297403800205
dc.relation/*ref*/Kirmani, M. D.; Khan, M. N. (2016). Environmental attributes and market segmentation: insights from India. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, v. 9, n. 2, 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2016.077767
dc.relation/*ref*/Lau, T.C.; Tan, B.C (2009). Religiosity as antecedent of attitude towards green products: An evaluation of religiosity and money ethics. Asean Marketing Journal, v. 1, n. 1, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.21002/amj.v1i1.1979
dc.relation/*ref*/Leary, R. B.; Minton, E. A.; Mittelstaedt, J. D. (2016). Thou shall not? The influence of religion on beliefs of stewardship and dominion, sustainable behaviors, and marketing systems. Journal of Macromarketing, v. 36, n. 4, 457-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146715626219
dc.relation/*ref*/Lévy Mangin, J. P.; Varela, J. (2006). Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales: temas esenciales, avanzados y aportaciones especiales. Netbiblo.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lim, E.; Arita, S.; Joung, S. (2019). Advancing Sustainable Consumption in Korea and Japan—From Re-Orientation of Consumer Behavior to Civic Actions. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 23, 6683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236683
dc.relation/*ref*/Mandaville, P. (2001) Transnational Muslim Politics: Reimagining the Umma. Editorial Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mas’od, A.; Chin, T. A. (2014). Determining socio-demographic, psychographic and religiosity of green hotel consumer in Malaysia. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, v. 130, 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.056
dc.relation/*ref*/Mayer, F. S.; Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 24, n. 4, 503-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Mazereeuw-van der Duijn Schouten, C.; Graafland, J.; Kaptein, M. (2014). Religiosity, CSR attitudes, and CSR behavior: An empirical study of executives’ religiosity and CSR. Journal of business ethics, n. 123, 437-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1847-3
dc.relation/*ref*/McAndrew, S.; Voas, D. (2011). Measuring religiosity using surveys. Survey Question Bank. Topic Overview, v. 4, n. 2, 1-15. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/263004/discover_sqb_religion_mcandrew_voas.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/McDaniel, S. W.; Burnett, J. J. (1990). Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluative criteria. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, v. 18, n. 2, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726426
dc.relation/*ref*/Millock, K.; Hansen, L. G.; Wier, M.; Anderson, L. M. (junio 2002). Willingness to pay for organic products: A comparison between survey data and panel data from Denmark [Conferencia]. 12th annual EAERE (European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Monterey, Estados Unidos. https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/1754/
dc.relation/*ref*/Mohamad, Z.F.; Idris, N.; Baharudin, A.; Muhammad, A.; Sulaiman, N. M. N. (2012). The role of religious community in recycling: empirical insight from Malaysia, Journal of Resource, Conservative and Recycling, v. 58, 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.020
dc.relation/*ref*/Mohd Dali, N. R. S.; Yousafzai, S.; Abdul Hamid, H. (2019). Religiosity scale development. Journal of Islamic Marketing, v. 10, n. 1, 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2016-0087
dc.relation/*ref*/Mohr, L. A.; Webb, D. J.; Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer affairs, v. 35, n. 1, 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Murphy, E. (2014). Manual de guerra espiritual. Grupo Nelson.
dc.relation/*ref*/Nunnally, J.; Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3a ed.). McGraw-Hill.
dc.relation/*ref*/Orriols, L. (2013). Social Class, Religiosity, and Vote Choice in Spain, 1979–2008. En Evans, G.; de Graaf, N. D., Political Choice Matters (360-390). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Podsakoff, P. M.; Mackenzie, S. B.; Lee, J. Y.; Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 88, n. 5, 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
dc.relation/*ref*/Prendergast, G. P.; Tsang, A. S. L. (2019). Explaining socially responsible consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, v. 36, n. 1, 146-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2018-2568
dc.relation/*ref*/Rice, G. (2006). Pro-environmental behavior in Egypt: is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of business ethics, v. 65, n. 4, 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0010-9
dc.relation/*ref*/Ringle, C. M.; Wende, S.; Will, A.; Becker, J. -M. (2018). SmartPLS 3.0 M3 Beta. https://www.smartpls.com/
dc.relation/*ref*/Rokeach, M. (1969). Value Systems in Religion. Review of Religious Research, v. 11, n. 1, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3510550
dc.relation/*ref*/Roshani Perera, C.; Rathnasiri Hewege, C. (2018). Religiosity and environmentally concerned consumer behaviour: ‘becoming one with god (nature)’ through surrendering environmental identities. International Journal of Consumer Studies, v. 42, n. 6, 627-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12469
dc.relation/*ref*/Shamdasani, P.; Chon-Lin, G. O.; Richmond, D. (1993). Exploring Green Consumers in an Oriental Culture: Role of Personal and Marketing Mix Factors. En McAlister L.; Rothschild, M. L. (Eds.), NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 20 (pp. 488-493). Association for Consumer Research. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/7504/volumes/v20/NA-20/full
dc.relation/*ref*/Sharma, C. S.; Sharma, N. (2017). Relationship between consumers' spirituality and green purchasing intentions: The mediation effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. Iim Kozhikode Society & Management Review, v. 6, n. 2, 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975216665694
dc.relation/*ref*/Sharma, N.; Sharma, C. S. (2013). Encouraging green purchasing behavior through green branding. An indian viewpoint. Business Analyst, v. 34, n. 2, 65-76.
dc.relation/*ref*/Sood, J.; Nasu, Y. (1995). Religiosity and nationality: An exploratory study of their effect on consumer behavior in Japan and the United States. Journal of Business Research, v. 34, n. 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00015-7
dc.relation/*ref*/Straughan, R. D.; Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, v. 16, n. 6, 558-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769910297506
dc.relation/*ref*/Suárez, E.; Hernández, B.; Gil-Giménez, D.; Corral-Verdugo, V. (2020). Determinants of Frugal Behavior: The Influences of Consciousness for Sustainable Consumption, Materialism, and the Consideration of Future Consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, 567752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567752
dc.relation/*ref*/Teimourpour, B.; Heidarzadeh Hanzaee, K. (2011). The impact of culture on luxury consumption behaviour among Iranian consumers. Journal of Islamic Marketing, v. 2, n. 3, 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831111164822
dc.relation/*ref*/Van Raaij, W. F. (1978). Cross-cultural research methodology as a case of construct validity. En Hunt, K.; Abor, A. (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (v. 5, pp. 693-701). Association for Consumer Research.
dc.relation/*ref*/Vela, C.; Ballesteros, C. (2011). La influencia de las creencias religiosas en el consumo. Una aproximación desde las tres religiones del Libro. Icade. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, n. 83-84, 393-411. https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/revistaicade/article/view/153
dc.relation/*ref*/Vermeir, I.; Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention”gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 19, n. 2, 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Webb, D. J.; Mohr, L. A.; Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of business research, v. 61, n. 2, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Webster Jr, F. E. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of consumer research, v. 2, n. 3, 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1086/208631
dc.relation/*ref*/Winkler, J. D.; Kanouse, D. E.; Ware, J. E. (1982). Controlling for acquiescence response set in scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 67, n. 5, 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.555
dc.relation/*ref*/Wold, H. (1975). Soft modelling by latent variables: The Non-Linear Iterative Partial Least Squares (NIPALS) approach. Journal of Applied Probability, v. 12, n. S1, 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021900200047604
dc.relation/*ref*/Woodhead, L. (2011). Five concepts of religion. International review of Sociology, v. 21, n. 1, 121-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.544192
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitanoes-ES
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 7 No. 14 (2021); e1809en-US
dc.sourceRevista CEA; Vol. 7 Núm. 14 (2021); e1809es-ES
dc.source2422-3182
dc.source2390-0725
dc.subjectMarket structureen-US
dc.subjectmarket behavioren-US
dc.subjectperceived consumer effectivenessen-US
dc.subjectsubjective normen-US
dc.subjectestructura del mercadoes-ES
dc.subjectcomportamiento del mercadoes-ES
dc.subjectefectividad percibida del consumidores-ES
dc.subjectnorma subjetivaes-ES
dc.titleInfluence of Religiosity, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Consumer Effectiveness on Socially Responsible Consumptionen-US
dc.titleInfluencia de la religiosidad, la norma subjetiva y la efectividad percibida del consumidor en el consumo socialmente responsablees-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
Miniatura
Nombre:
revistacea_7_1809.pdf
Tamaño:
659.66 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_638166672007.epub
Tamaño:
456.34 KB
Formato:
Electronic publishing
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
ojsitm_638166672007.xml
Tamaño:
167.62 KB
Formato:
Extensible Markup Language
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
2049.html
Tamaño:
175.36 KB
Formato:
Hypertext Markup Language
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista CEA - Cosecha Portal de Revistas